These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575903)
1. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Cutler A; van Donselaar W Lang Speech; 2001 Jun; 44(Pt 2):171-95. PubMed ID: 11575903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners. Cooper N; Cutler A; Wales R Lang Speech; 2002 Sep; 45(Pt 3):207-28. PubMed ID: 12693685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition. Jesse A; McQueen JM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition. van Donselaar W; Koster M; Cutler A Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):251-73. PubMed ID: 15903117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition. Jesse A; Poellmann K; Kong YY J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 28056135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech. Reinisch E; Weber A J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech. Kong YY; Jesse A J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress. Bosker HR Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):472-490. PubMed ID: 34227417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):772-83. PubMed ID: 19691004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue. Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress. Brown M; Salverda AP; Dilley LC; Tanenhaus MK J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):306-23. PubMed ID: 25621583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tracking talker-specific cues to lexical stress: Evidence from perceptual learning. Severijnen GGA; Di Dona G; Bosker HR; McQueen JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):549-565. PubMed ID: 37184938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric processing of lexical tonal contrast in Swedish. Felder V; Jönsson-Steiner E; Eulitz C; Lahiri A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1890-9. PubMed ID: 19933571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of lexical prosody and word familiarity on lexical access of spoken Japanese words. Sekiguchi T J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Jul; 35(4):369-84. PubMed ID: 16718584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability. Severijnen GGA; Bosker HR; Piai V; McQueen JM Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1769():147605. PubMed ID: 34363790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metrical segmentation in Dutch: vowel quality or stress? Quené H; Koster ML Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():185-202. PubMed ID: 10194876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Contribution of Segmental and Tonal Information in Mandarin Spoken Word Processing. Sereno JA; Lee H Lang Speech; 2015 Jun; 58(Pt 2):131-51. PubMed ID: 26677639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian. Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Norris D; McQueen JM; Cutler A Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 12061760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch. van Alphen PM; McQueen JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]