BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575903)

  • 1. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch.
    Cutler A; van Donselaar W
    Lang Speech; 2001 Jun; 44(Pt 2):171-95. PubMed ID: 11575903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners.
    Cooper N; Cutler A; Wales R
    Lang Speech; 2002 Sep; 45(Pt 3):207-28. PubMed ID: 12693685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the role of lexical stress in lexical recognition.
    van Donselaar W; Koster M; Cutler A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):251-73. PubMed ID: 15903117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.
    Jesse A; Poellmann K; Kong YY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 28056135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress.
    Bosker HR
    Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):472-490. PubMed ID: 34227417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: lexical stress drives eye movements immediately.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):772-83. PubMed ID: 19691004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.
    Brown M; Salverda AP; Dilley LC; Tanenhaus MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):306-23. PubMed ID: 25621583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tracking talker-specific cues to lexical stress: Evidence from perceptual learning.
    Severijnen GGA; Di Dona G; Bosker HR; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Apr; 49(4):549-565. PubMed ID: 37184938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetric processing of lexical tonal contrast in Swedish.
    Felder V; Jönsson-Steiner E; Eulitz C; Lahiri A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1890-9. PubMed ID: 19933571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of lexical prosody and word familiarity on lexical access of spoken Japanese words.
    Sekiguchi T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Jul; 35(4):369-84. PubMed ID: 16718584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability.
    Severijnen GGA; Bosker HR; Piai V; McQueen JM
    Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1769():147605. PubMed ID: 34363790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metrical segmentation in Dutch: vowel quality or stress?
    Quené H; Koster ML
    Lang Speech; 1998; 41 ( Pt 2)():185-202. PubMed ID: 10194876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Contribution of Segmental and Tonal Information in Mandarin Spoken Word Processing.
    Sereno JA; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2015 Jun; 58(Pt 2):131-51. PubMed ID: 26677639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian.
    Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming.
    Norris D; McQueen JM; Cutler A
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 12061760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch.
    van Alphen PM; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.