285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11576808)
1. Logistic regression in the medical literature: standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain.
Bagley SC; White H; Golomb BA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):979-85. PubMed ID: 11576808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An introduction to logistic regression: from basic concepts to interpretation with particular attention to nursing domain.
Park HA
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2013 Apr; 43(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 23703593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An appraisal of multivariable logistic models in the pulmonary and critical care literature.
Moss M; Wellman DA; Cotsonis GA
Chest; 2003 Mar; 123(3):923-8. PubMed ID: 12628895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of logistic regression reporting in current obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Mikolajczyk RT; DiSilvestro A; Zhang J
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 111(2 Pt 1):413-9. PubMed ID: 18238980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Logistic regression models in obstetrics and gynecology literature.
Khan KS; Chien PF; Dwarakanath LS
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1014-20. PubMed ID: 10362173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting quality of multivariable logistic regression in selected Indian medical journals.
Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22718056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of quality of multivariable logistic regression in Indian medical journals using multilevel modeling approach.
Kumar R; Indrayan A; Chhabra P
Indian J Public Health; 2016; 60(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 27350702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A review of two journals found that articles using multivariable logistic regression frequently did not report commonly recommended assumptions.
Ottenbacher KJ; Ottenbacher HR; Tooth L; Ostir GV
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1147-52. PubMed ID: 15567630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reporting of multivariable methods in the medical literature.
Tetrault JM; Sauler M; Wells CK; Concato J
J Investig Med; 2008 Oct; 56(7):954-7. PubMed ID: 18797413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In Behavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 statement.
Tate RL; Perdices M; Rosenkoetter U; Shadish W; Vohra S; Barlow DH; Horner R; Kazdin A; Kratochwill T; McDonald S; Sampson M; Shamseer L; Togher L; Albin R; Backman C; Douglas J; Evans JJ; Gast D; Manolov R; Mitchell G; Nickels L; Nikles J; Ownsworth T; Rose M; Schmid CH; Wilson B
Can J Occup Ther; 2016 Jun; 83(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 27231387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.
Tate RL; Perdices M; Rosenkoetter U; Shadish W; Vohra S; Barlow DH; Horner R; Kazdin A; Kratochwill T; McDonald S; Sampson M; Shamseer L; Togher L; Albin R; Backman C; Douglas J; Evans JJ; Gast D; Manolov R; Mitchell G; Nickels L; Nikles J; Ownsworth T; Rose M; Schmid CH; Wilson B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():142-52. PubMed ID: 27101888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Assessment of multivariate logistic regression analysis in articles published in Turkish cardiology journals].
Tanboğa IH; Kurt M; Işik T; Kaya A; Ekinci M; Aksakal E; Sevimli S; Cayli M
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2012 Mar; 40(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22710601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.
O'Leary JD; Crawford MW
Can J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 60(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 23760791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Frequency of Reporting Ethical Issues in Human Subject Articles Published in Iranian Medical Journals: 2009-2013.
Astaneh B; Khani P
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 29127671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting guidelines and journal quality in otolaryngology.
Henderson AH; Upile T; Pilavakis Y; Patel NN
Clin Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 41(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 26412303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.
Jackson DL; Gillaspy JA; Purc-Stephenson R
Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):6-23. PubMed ID: 19271845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting quality for abstracts of randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research.
Guo JW; Iribarren SJ
Cancer Nurs; 2014; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 24406384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
