These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11578059)
1. Attentional capture with various distractor and target types. Chastain G; Cheal M Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):979-90. PubMed ID: 11578059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: no special role for onsets. Watson DG; Humphreys GW Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):583-97. PubMed ID: 7644319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: attentional set for perceptual transients. Atchley P; Kramer AF; Hillstrom AP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):594-606. PubMed ID: 10811165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can new objects override attentional control settings? Folk CL; Remington R Percept Psychophys; 1999 May; 61(4):727-39. PubMed ID: 10370339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Size scaling and spatial factors in visual attention. Goolkasian P Am J Psychol; 1997; 110(3):397-415. PubMed ID: 9339537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Wienrich C; Janczyk M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new object captures attention--but only when you know it's new. Chua FK Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):699-711. PubMed ID: 19429953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of relational information in contingent capture. Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Franconeri SL; Simons DJ Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):999-1010. PubMed ID: 14674628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Joseph JS; Optican LM Percept Psychophys; 1996 Jul; 58(5):651-65. PubMed ID: 8710445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Redundancy effects of a moving distractor generated by alerting and orienting. Utochkin IS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1825-30. PubMed ID: 19933565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds. Mounts JR Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1485-93. PubMed ID: 11143458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Moore KS; Weissman DH Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do new objects capture attention? Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]