These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11578083)

  • 1. Visuospatial attention: the role of target contrast and task difficulty when assessing the effects of cues.
    Snowden RJ; Willey J; Muir JL
    Perception; 2001; 30(8):983-91. PubMed ID: 11578083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of endogenous attention on contrast perception, contrast discrimination, and saccadic reaction time.
    Mahadevan MS; Bedell HE; Stevenson SB
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():89-102. PubMed ID: 29180106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations.
    Pestilli F; Carrasco M
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1867-75. PubMed ID: 15797776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan.
    Greenwood PM; Parasuraman R; Haxby JV
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 May; 31(5):471-85. PubMed ID: 8502379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task-dependent exogenous cuing effects depend on cue modality.
    van der Lubbe RH; Havik MM; Bekker EM; Postma A
    Psychophysiology; 2006 Mar; 43(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 16712585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades.
    Gersch TM; Kowler E; Dosher B
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1469-83. PubMed ID: 15066405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast discrimination with and without spatial uncertainty.
    Nachmias J
    Vision Res; 2002 Jan; 42(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11804630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physical self-similarity enhances the gaze-cueing effect.
    Hungr CJ; Hunt AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1250-9. PubMed ID: 22670723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.
    Holmes A; Mogg K; Garcia LM; Bradley BP
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 20162493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
    Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exogenous attentional capture by subliminal abrupt-onset cues: evidence from contrast-polarity independent cueing effects.
    Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):974-88. PubMed ID: 23106374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.