These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11578834)

  • 21. Early stages (P100) of face perception in humans as measured with event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Herrmann MJ; Ehlis AC; Ellgring H; Fallgatter AJ
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2005 Aug; 112(8):1073-81. PubMed ID: 15583954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aging effect in pattern, motion and cognitive visual evoked potentials.
    Kuba M; Kremláček J; Langrová J; Kubová Z; Szanyi J; Vít F
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():9-16. PubMed ID: 22503557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The temporal sequence of evoked and induced cortical responses to implied-motion processing in human motion area V5/MT+.
    Fawcett IP; Hillebrand A; Singh KD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):775-83. PubMed ID: 17686049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal check size and reversal rate to elicit pattern-reversal MEG responses.
    Chen WT; Ko YC; Liao KK; Hsieh JC; Yeh TC; Wu ZA; Ho LT; Lin YY
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 May; 32(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 16018158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex.
    Sams M; Hietanen JK; Hari R; Ilmoniemi RJ; Lounasmaa OV
    Neuroscience; 1997 Mar; 77(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 9044373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ocular dominance affects magnitude of dipole moment: an MEG study.
    Shima H; Hasegawa M; Tachibana O; Nomura M; Yamashita J; Ozaki Y; Kawai J; Higuchi M; Kado H
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):817-21. PubMed ID: 20613677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual responses in the temporal cortex to moving objects with invariant contours.
    Tanaka YZ; Koyama T; Mikami A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Sep; 146(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 12195527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetic responses of human visual cortex to illusory contours.
    Ohtani Y; Okamura S; Shibasaki T; Arakawa A; Yoshida Y; Toyama K; Ejima Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Mar; 321(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 11880200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential.
    Di Russo F; Martínez A; Sereno MI; Pitzalis S; Hillyard SA
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Feb; 15(2):95-111. PubMed ID: 11835601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex.
    Andrews TJ; Davies-Thompson J; Kingstone A; Young AW
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(9):3544-52. PubMed ID: 20203214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatiotemporal phase-scrambling increases visual cortex activity.
    Fraedrich EM; Glasauer S; Flanagin VL
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jun; 21(8):596-600. PubMed ID: 20431494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Internal valence modulates the speed of object recognition.
    Panichello MF; Kveraga K; Chaumon M; Bar M; Barrett LF
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):361. PubMed ID: 28336933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Familiarity facilitates the corticocortical processing of face perception.
    Goto Y; Kinoe H; Nakashima T; Tobimatsu S
    Neuroreport; 2005 Aug; 16(12):1329-34. PubMed ID: 16056134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing.
    Gauthier I; Curran T; Curby KM; Collins D
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 12627167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?
    Epstein RA; Ward EJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Feb; 20(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 19457939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli.
    Allison T; Puce A; Spencer DD; McCarthy G
    Cereb Cortex; 1999; 9(5):415-30. PubMed ID: 10450888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differential human brain activation by vertical and horizontal global visual textures.
    Aspell JE; Wattam-Bell J; Atkinson J; Braddick OJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 May; 202(3):669-79. PubMed ID: 20131046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG.
    Halgren E; Raij T; Marinkovic K; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2000 Jan; 10(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 10639397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Face categorization in visual scenes may start in a higher order area of the right fusiform gyrus: evidence from dynamic visual stimulation in neuroimaging.
    Jiang F; Dricot L; Weber J; Righi G; Tarr MJ; Goebel R; Rossion B
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 106(5):2720-36. PubMed ID: 21734108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.