BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11580731)

  • 1. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure.
    Bø K; Finckenhagen HB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Oct; 80(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 11580731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter- and intrarater reliability of unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation to evaluation of maximal voluntary contraction of pelvic floor muscles considering risk factors and dysfunctions.
    da Silva JB; de Oliveira Sato T; Rocha APR; Driusso P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Jan; 40(1):348-357. PubMed ID: 33152173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: A reliability and correlation study.
    Navarro Brazález B; Torres Lacomba M; de la Villa P; Sánchez Sánchez B; Prieto Gómez V; Asúnsolo Del Barco Á; McLean L
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jan; 37(1):269-277. PubMed ID: 28455942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the size of the vaginal probe affect measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength?
    Bø K; Raastad R; Finckenhagen HB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Feb; 84(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15683371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there any difference in measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength in supine and standing position?
    Bø K; Finckenhagen HB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Dec; 82(12):1120-4. PubMed ID: 14616257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Comparative intra- and inter-rater reliability of maximal voluntary contraction with unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation and construct validity with Peritron manometer".
    Silva JBD; Sato TO; Rocha APR; Driusso P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):721-731. PubMed ID: 31873956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal weight cones. Theoretical framework, effect on pelvic floor muscle strength and female stress urinary incontinence.
    Bø K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Feb; 74(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 7900518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer to measure pelvic floor muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence.
    Romero-Cullerés G; Peña-Pitarch E; Jané-Feixas C; Arnau A; Montesinos J; Abenoza-Guardiola M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Feb; 36(2):333-337. PubMed ID: 26584652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction reduce vaginal resting pressure and resting EMG activity?
    Naess I; Bø K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1623-1627. PubMed ID: 29532122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic floor muscle strength and response to pelvic floor muscle training for stress urinary incontinence.
    Bø K
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 14595609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of pelvic floor muscle contraction on the profile of vaginal closure pressure in continent and stress urinary incontinent women.
    Shishido K; Peng Q; Jones R; Omata S; Constantinou CE
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1917-22. PubMed ID: 18353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Muscle strength measurement of pelvic floor in women by vaginal dynamometer].
    Parezanović-Ilić K; Jevtić M; Jeremić B; Arsenijević S
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2009; 137(9-10):511-7. PubMed ID: 19950758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidirectional pelvic floor muscle strength measurement.
    Saleme CS; Rocha DN; Del Vecchio S; Silva Filho AL; Pinotti M
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1594-600. PubMed ID: 19495980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative assessment of pelvic floor function using vaginal cones, vaginal digital palpation and vaginal pressure measurements.
    Hahn I; Milsom I; Ohlsson BL; Ekelund P; Uhlemann C; Fall M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1996; 41(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 8793498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction in continent and incontinent women using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing and vaginal squeeze pressure measurements.
    Thompson JA; O'Sullivan PB; Briffa NK; Neumann P
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Nov; 17(6):624-30. PubMed ID: 16532264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction with palpation, perineometry and transperineal ultrasound: a cross-sectional study.
    Volløyhaug I; Mørkved S; Salvesen Ø; Salvesen KÅ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 47(6):768-73. PubMed ID: 26300128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pelvic floor muscle strength in primigravidae and non-pregnant nulliparous women: a comparative study.
    Palmezoni VP; Santos MD; Pereira JM; Bernardes BT; Pereira-Baldon VS; Resende AP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 27465305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic floor muscle strength and thickness in continent and incontinent nulliparous pregnant women.
    Mørkved S; Salvesen KA; Bø K; Eik-Nes S
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(6):384-9; discussion 390. PubMed ID: 15278255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of Electromyography and Digital Palpation Measurement of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength in Postpartum Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence and Asymptomatic Parturients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Yang X; Zhu L; Li W; Sun X; Huang Q; Tong B; Xie Z
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 31336374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coital incontinence and vaginal symptoms and the relationship to pelvic floor muscle function in primiparous women at 12 months postpartum: a cross-sectional study.
    Tennfjord MK; Hilde G; Stær-Jensen J; Siafarikas F; Engh ME; Bø K
    J Sex Med; 2015 Apr; 12(4):994-1003. PubMed ID: 25648191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.