These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Qualitative comparison of coronary angiograms between 4 French catheters with an advanced cardiovascular injection system and 6 French catheters with manual injection. Gonzalez MA; Ben-Dor I; Gaglia MA; Torguson R; Shimellis H; Bui A; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 79(5):843-8. PubMed ID: 21805567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with acisted power injection: A randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation. Khoukaz S; Kern MJ; Bitar SR; Azrak E; Eisenhauer M; Wolford T; El-Shafei A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11246259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary angiography using 4 French catheters with power injection: a randomized comparison with 6 French catheters. Arora P; Naik N; Bahl VK; Mishra S; Yadav R; Sharma S; Manchanda SC Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 12086383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel diagnostic catheter specifically designed for both coronary arteries via the right transradial approach. A prospective, randomized trial of Tiger II vs. Judkins catheters. Kim SM; Kim DK; Kim DI; Kim DS; Joo SJ; Lee JW Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2006; 22(3-4):295-303. PubMed ID: 16328852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Four French catheters for diagnostic coronary angiography. Mehta H; Chatterjee T; Windecker S; Eberli FR; Fleisch M; Seiler C; Hess OM; Meier B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 12594686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 6 and 7 French guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention: results of a randomised trial with a vascular ultrasound endpoint. Juergens CP; Hallani H; Leung DY; Crozier JA; Robinson JT; Lo S; Hopkins AP Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Dec; 66(4):528-34. PubMed ID: 16208714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised comparison of the use of 4 and 6 French diagnostic catheters: the limits of downsizing. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Di Blasi A; Predolini S; Laterza C; Quaini E Int J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 79(2-3):113-7; discussion 117-8. PubMed ID: 11461729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized study of 4.1 French catheters utilizing the percutaneous right brachial approach for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Talley JD; Smith SM; Walton-Shirley M; Hattel L; Szabo T; Godlewski K; Stahr L; Yussman Z; Palmer S; Vogel R Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 May; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 1499063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 4 and 6 French catheters for coronary angiography: real-world modeling. Durst R; Lotan C; Nassar H; Gotsman M; Mor E; Varshitzki B; Greganski P; Jabara R; Admon D; Meerkin D; Mosseri M Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Apr; 9(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 17491224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized comparison of rapid ambulation using radial, 4 French femoral access, or femoral access with AngioSeal closure. Reddy BK; Brewster PS; Walsh T; Burket MW; Thomas WJ; Cooper CJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 15170701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomised comparison of JUDkins vs. tiGEr catheter in coronary angiography via the right radial artery: the JUDGE study. Xanthopoulou I; Stavrou K; Davlouros P; Tsigkas G; Koufou E; Almpanis G; Koutouzis M; Tsiafoutis I; Perperis A; Moulias A; Koutsogiannis N; Hahalis G EuroIntervention; 2018 Mar; 13(16):1950-1958. PubMed ID: 29061547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of new 4 French catheters by comparison to 6 French coronary artery images. Saito T; Date H; Taniguchi I; Hokimoto S; Yamamoto N; Nakamura S; Ishibashi F; Noda K; Oshima S J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Jan; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10745431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Heart catheterization via the femoral artery with a 4 French and mobilization at 2 hours]. Conte L; Dutto M; Dutto S; Giachello G; Lice G; Tomatis M; Russo P; Dellavalle A; Ribichini F; Steffenino G G Ital Cardiol; 1999 May; 29(5):529-32. PubMed ID: 10367220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized evaluation of 5 French catheters for coronary angiography with or without the CO2 powered Hercules syringe. Pande AK; Meier B; Villavicencio R; Urban P; de la Serna F J Invasive Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 4(3):136-8. PubMed ID: 10149894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography using 5 French preformed (Judkins) catheters from the percutaneous right brachial approach: a comparative analysis with the femoral approach. Bush CA; VanFossen DB; Kolibash AJ; Magorien RD; Bacon JP; Ansel GM; Eaton GM; Ramancik MJ; Orsini AR; Palmer SL Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Aug; 29(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 8221844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized trial of Novoste right versus Judkins catheters for engagement of the right coronary artery during diagnostic catheterization. Joseph SA; Talley JD; Ammash N; Goad J; Maldonado C; Vogel R; Shih A; Yussman Z J Interv Cardiol; 1993 Sep; 6(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 10151019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five French versus 6 French PCI: a case control study of efficacy, safety and outcome. Rakhit RD; Matter C; Windecker S; Garachemani AR; Seiler C; Eberli FR J Invasive Cardiol; 2002 Nov; 14(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 12403895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]