BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11583415)

  • 1. Direct and correlated responses to two-stage selection for ovulation rate and number of fully formed pigs at birth in swine.
    Ruíz-Flores A; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Sep; 79(9):2286-97. PubMed ID: 11583415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK; Nielsen MK; Casey DS
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence of splayleg pigs in Nebraska litter size selection lines.
    Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15583040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Candidate gene analysis for loci affecting litter size and ovulation rate in swine.
    Linville RC; Pomp D; Johnson RK; Rothschild MF
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 11204716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in ovulation rate, uterine capacity, uterine dimensions, and parity effects with selection for litter size in swine.
    Gama LL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):608-17. PubMed ID: 8463147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4806-22. PubMed ID: 25349336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of plasma FSH concentration in boars and gilts from lines selected for ovulation rate and embryonal survival, and litter size and estimation of (co)variance components for FSH and ovulation rate.
    Cassady JP; Johnson RK; Ford JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 10875623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Canario L; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1615-24. PubMed ID: 17371794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
    Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity.
    Freking BA; Leymaster KA; Vallet JL; Christenson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2093-103. PubMed ID: 17504953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlated responses of pre- and postweaning growth and backfat thickness to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Canario L; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3209-17. PubMed ID: 17609463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Gogué J; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 17235020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive, endocrine, and organ weight differences of swine selected for high or low serum cholesterol.
    Wise T; Young LD; Pond WG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Oct; 71(10):2732-8. PubMed ID: 8226374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting reproduction in pigs.
    Cassady JP; Johnson RK; Pomp D; Rohrer GA; Van Vleck LD; Spiegel EK; Gilson KM
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Mar; 79(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 11263822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
    Holl JW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits.
    Noguera JL; Varona L; Babot D; Estany J
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2548-55. PubMed ID: 12413076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection for litter size in pigs. II. Efficiency of closed and open selection lines.
    Bolet G; Bidanel JP; Ollivier L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(5):515-28. PubMed ID: 11712972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlated responses on litter size traits and survival traits after two-stage selection for ovulation rate and litter size in rabbits.
    Badawy AY; Peiró R; Blasco A; Santacreu MA
    Animal; 2019 Mar; 13(3):453-459. PubMed ID: 30124175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.