These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11583896)

  • 1. Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Kirk MM; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Oct; 38(4):1150-5. PubMed ID: 11583896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 9(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 9554728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of shock polarity on biphasic defibrillation thresholds using an active pectoral lead system.
    Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):350-4. PubMed ID: 9581951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 8806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic waveforms prevent the chronic rise of defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Kavesh NG; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 30(1):233-6. PubMed ID: 9207647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early postoperative rise in defibrillation threshold in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead systems: attenuation with biphasic shock waveforms.
    Schwartzman D; Callans DJ; Gottlieb CD; Heo J; Marchlinski FE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 8743754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of shock polarity on defibrillation thresholds with a hybrid patch-coil lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 9(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 14618062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Options in managing the patient with high defibrillation thresholds.
    Robinson LA; Windle JR; Easley AR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 May; 57(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 8179383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using a transvenous lead system.
    Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 8759811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The subcutaneous array: a new lead adjunct for the transvenous ICD to lower defibrillation thresholds.
    Higgins SL; Alexander DC; Kuypers CJ; Brewster SA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1540-8. PubMed ID: 7479175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defibrillation thresholds are increased by right-sided implantation of totally transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
    Friedman PA; Rasmussen MJ; Grice S; Trusty J; Glikson M; Stanton MS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1186-92. PubMed ID: 10461295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
    Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
    Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system.
    Hodgson DM; Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Daly B; Gold MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 25(4 Pt 1):408-13. PubMed ID: 11991364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective randomized comparison of 65%/65% versus 42%/42% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation thresholds in humans.
    Shepard RK; DeGroot PJ; Pacifico A; Wood MA; Ellenbogen KA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Jun; 8(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12815309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal method to achieve consistently low defibrillation energy requirements.
    Winter J; Zimmermann N; Lidolt H; Dees H; Perings C; Vester EG; Poll L; Schipke JD; Contzen K; Gams E
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):71K-75K. PubMed ID: 11084103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.