These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11584188)

  • 21. [Clinical prediction rules: a reader's guide].
    Perrier A; Perneger T
    Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Apr; 20(2 Pt 1):249-56. PubMed ID: 12844022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A simplified clinical model to predict pulmonary embolism in patients with acute dyspnea.
    Chen JY; Chao TH; Guo YL; Hsu CH; Huang YY; Chen JH; Lin LJ
    Int Heart J; 2006 Mar; 47(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 16607053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining the clinical probability of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
    Hunt D
    South Med J; 2007 Oct; 100(10):1015-21; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 17943048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The unresolved issue of false-positive D-dimer results in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism].
    Hugli O; Aujesky D
    Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Aug; 7(305):1588-92. PubMed ID: 21922725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probability scores and diagnostic algorithms in pulmonary embolism: are they followed in clinical practice?
    Sanjuán P; Rodríguez-Núñez N; Rábade C; Lama A; Ferreiro L; González-Barcala FJ; Alvarez-Dobaño JM; Toubes ME; Golpe A; Valdés L
    Arch Bronconeumol; 2014 May; 50(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 24360086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preemptive Anticoagulation in Patients With a High Pretest Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Are Guidelines Followed?
    Willoughby L; Adams DM; Evans RS; Lloyd JF; Stevens SM; Woller SC; Bledsoe JR; Aston VT; Wilson EL; Elliott CG
    Chest; 2018 May; 153(5):1153-1159. PubMed ID: 29154971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of three clinical prediction rules among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism].
    Ulukavak Ciftçi T; Köktürk N; Demir N; Oğuzülgen KI; Ekim N
    Tuberk Toraks; 2005; 53(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 16258884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis: use of clinical probability algorithms.
    Gandara E; Wells PS
    Clin Chest Med; 2010 Dec; 31(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 21047572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model.
    Penaloza A; Mélot C; Dochy E; Blocklet D; Gevenois PA; Wautrecht JC; Lheureux P; Motte S
    Thromb Res; 2007; 120(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17055556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
    Palla A; Bardi G; Ribas C
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Nov; 32(8):822-30. PubMed ID: 17171596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of high pretest probability patients undergoing d-dimer testing for pulmonary embolism: a pilot study.
    Kabrhel C
    J Emerg Med; 2008 Nov; 35(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 18343077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Positive Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Prediction Rules, Thromboembolic Risk Factors, and Implications for Appropriate Use.
    Vongchaiudomchoke T; Boonyasirinant T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jan; 99(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 27455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Likelihood ratios increase diagnostic certainty in pulmonary embolism.
    Chu K; Brown AF
    Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Aug; 17(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 16091094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study.
    Leclercq MG; Lutisan JG; van Marwijk Kooy M; Kuipers BF; Oostdijk AH; van der Leur JJ; Büller HR
    Thromb Haemost; 2003 Jan; 89(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 12540959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study.
    Runyon MS; Webb WB; Jones AE; Kline JA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Jul; 12(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 15995088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
    Wilbur J; Shian B
    Am Fam Physician; 2012 Nov; 86(10):913-9. PubMed ID: 23157144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pulmonary embolism: from clinical presentation to clinical probability assessment.
    Perrier A
    Semin Vasc Med; 2001 Nov; 1(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 15199497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurement of expired carbon dioxide, oxygen and volume in conjunction with pretest probability estimation as a method to diagnose and exclude pulmonary venous thromboembolism.
    Kline JA; Hogg M
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 Jul; 26(4):212-9. PubMed ID: 16836693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Clinically Meaningful Interpretation of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) II and III Data.
    Cronin P; Dwamena BA
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):561-572. PubMed ID: 29337091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinician gestalt estimate of pretest probability for acute coronary syndrome and pulmonary embolism in patients with chest pain and dyspnea.
    Kline JA; Stubblefield WB
    Ann Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 63(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 24070658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.