197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11585190)
1. An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups.
Jenkinson C; Chandola T; Coulter A; Bruster S
J Public Health Med; 2001 Sep; 23(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 11585190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating health needs: the impact of a checklist of conditions and quality of life measurement on health information derived from community surveys.
Knight M; Stewart-Brown S; Fletcher L
J Public Health Med; 2001 Sep; 23(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 11585189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The SF-36 physical and mental health summary measures: an example of how to interpret scores.
Jenkinson C
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1998 Apr; 3(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 10180668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and testing of the UK SF-12 (short form health survey).
Jenkinson C; Layte R
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1997 Jan; 2(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada.
Johnson JA; Pickard AS
Med Care; 2000 Jan; 38(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 10630726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance of the English, Mandarin, and Malay versions of the SF-12v2 within a representative sample of the multi-ethnic Singapore population.
Lau JH; Abdin E; Vaingankar JA; Shafie S; Sambasivam R; Shahwan S; Thumboo J; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):80. PubMed ID: 33691707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population.
Kontodimopoulos N; Pappa E; Niakas D; Tountas Y
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Sep; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17900374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring health-related quality of life: psychometric evaluation of the Tunisian version of the SF-12 health survey.
Younsi M; Chakroun M
Qual Life Res; 2014 Sep; 23(7):2047-54. PubMed ID: 24515673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Generic measures of health-related quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis: reliability, validity and responsiveness.
Haywood KL; Garratt AM; Dziedzic K; Dawes PT
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2002 Dec; 41(12):1380-7. PubMed ID: 12468817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Voleti PB; Berkanish P; Cohn MR; Altchek DW; Allen AA; Williams RJ
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Oct; 45(12):2784-2790. PubMed ID: 28727937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discriminative power of the health status questionnaire 12 in relation to age, sex, and longstanding illness: findings from a survey of households in Great Britain.
Bowling A; Windsor J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Oct; 51(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 9425468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of life of Australian chronically-ill adults: patient and practice characteristics matter.
Jayasinghe UW; Proudfoot J; Barton CA; Amoroso C; Holton C; Davies GP; Beilby J; Harris MF
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2009 Jun; 7():50. PubMed ID: 19493336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting an SF-6D preference-based score using MCS and PCS scores from the SF-12 or SF-36.
Hanmer J
Value Health; 2009 Sep; 12(6):958-66. PubMed ID: 19490549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The SF-36 Arthritis-Specific Health Index (ASHI): II. Tests of validity in four clinical trials.
Keller SD; Ware JE; Hatoum HT; Kong SX
Med Care; 1999 May; 37(5 Suppl):MS51-60. PubMed ID: 10335743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.
Jenkinson C; Stewart-Brown S; Petersen S; Paice C
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1999 Jan; 53(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10326053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample.
Jenkinson C; Wright L; Coulter A
Qual Life Res; 1994 Feb; 3(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8142947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey.
Cheak-Zamora NC; Wyrwich KW; McBride TD
Qual Life Res; 2009 Aug; 18(6):727-35. PubMed ID: 19424821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement properties and normative data for the Norwegian SF-36: results from a general population survey.
Garratt AM; Stavem K
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Mar; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 28292292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions.
Reulen RC; Zeegers MP; Jenkinson C; Lancashire ER; Winter DL; Jenney ME; Hawkins MM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Oct; 4():77. PubMed ID: 17022814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The construct validity of the Short Form-36 Health Survey for patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain.
de Vries GE; Jorritsma W; Dijkstra PU; Geertzen JH; Reneman MF
Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Jun; 38(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 25521576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
