These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11585398)

  • 1. Updated audit database for breast imaging/histopathology correlation.
    Foord K; Guy R; Apthorp L; How K; Trevethick P; Ziemann M
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Sep; 56(9):755-62. PubMed ID: 11585398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical audit and standard setting for symptomatic breast imaging in South Thames region.
    Mills P; Foord K; Trevethick P
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Jan; 52(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 9022582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of breast imaging reports falls short of recommended standards.
    Houssami N; Boyages J; Stuart K; Brennan M
    Breast; 2007 Jun; 16(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 17270445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 3 year audit of fine needle aspirates from a symptomatic breast clinic.
    Lioe TF; Elliott H; Allen DC; Spence RA
    Ulster Med J; 1997 May; 66(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 9185486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma.
    Boetes C; Veltman J; van Die L; Bult P; Wobbes T; Barentsz JO
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15218359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mammography and mammary ultrasonography: which examination sequence is preferable?].
    Müller-Schimpfle M; Stern W; Stoll P; Kaiser JW; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography in hospital patients: use and misuse.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ; Turner MJ
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Feb; 37(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 1573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding the Mammography Audit.
    Funaro K; Ataya D; Niell B
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 33222999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.
    Murphy IG; Dillon MF; Doherty AO; McDermott EW; Kelly G; O'Higgins N; Hill AD
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 96(6):457-63. PubMed ID: 17929256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a scoring system for breast imaging.
    Roche NA; Given-Wilson RM; Thomas VA; Sacks NP
    Br J Surg; 1998 May; 85(5):669-72. PubMed ID: 9635819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
    Sheybani EO; Sankar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
    Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geographical distribution of breast cancers on the mammogram: an interval cancer database.
    Brown M; Eccles C; Wallis MG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):317-22. PubMed ID: 11387148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance. How to audit your own mammography practice.
    Sickles EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 1732933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast carcinomas: why are they missed?
    Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Chaiwun B
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Oct; 47(10):851-7. PubMed ID: 16990959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A national breast cancer database.
    Smith R; Osuch JR; Linver MN
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1247-57. PubMed ID: 7480668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu P; Miglioretti DL; Quale C; Rosenberg RD; Cutter G; Geller B; Bacchetti P; Sickles EA; Kerlikowske K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 15741572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [An investigation of the accuracy of mammography--diagnosis without a knowledge of the clinical findings (author's transl)].
    Hüttner J; Dallüge KH; Eichhorn HJ; Jacob R; Kriedemann E; Lessel A; Mateev B; Richter E; Rotte KH; Schröder H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1974 May; 120(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 4367796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
    Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The treatment of non-palpable breast tumors found during mammographic screening at our hospital].
    Henrietta B; Eva S; Eniko N
    Magy Seb; 2005 Jun; 58(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16167469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.