164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11586139)
1. Improving the pullout strength of pedicle screws by screw coupling.
Suzuki T; Abe E; Okuyama K; Sato K
J Spinal Disord; 2001 Oct; 14(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 11586139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines.
Sarzier JS; Evans AJ; Cahill DW
J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):309-12. PubMed ID: 11990840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method.
Renner SM; Lim TH; Kim WJ; Katolik L; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):E212-6. PubMed ID: 15167670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative analysis of misplaced pedicle screws in the thoracic spine: how much pullout strength is lost?: presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting.
Brasiliense LB; Theodore N; Lazaro BC; Sayed ZA; Deniz FE; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):503-8. PubMed ID: 20433298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.
Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Turner JL; Crandall DG; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 23602373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.
Yu T; Zhang X; Liu J; Li S; Shan Z; Fan S; Zhao F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():14-21. PubMed ID: 29407351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.
Liu D; Sheng J; Wu HH; Kang X; Xie QY; Luo Y; Zhou JJ; Zheng W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 29(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30192220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Sansur CA; Caffes NM; Ibrahimi DM; Pratt NL; Lewis EM; Murgatroyd AA; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 27176113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical study of two different pedicle screw methods for fixation in osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic vertebrae.
Higashino K; Kim JH; Horton WC; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2012; 21(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 23327843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation.
Halvorson TL; Kelley LA; Thomas KA; Whitecloud TS; Cook SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(21):2415-20. PubMed ID: 7846594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pullout evaluation of sawbone experiment in different types of pedicle screws combined with bone cement augmentation for severe osteoporotic spine.
Yang SC; Liu PH; Tu YK
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 30220723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]