These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response. Horton R Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Britain's failure to tackle research misconduct: UK bodies are now working together to set up panel on misconduct. Lowe GD; Murray GD; Finlayson ND BMJ; 2004 Jan; 328(7433):229-30. PubMed ID: 14739207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Research integrity. U.S. universities urged to do a better job. Kaiser J Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5580):321. PubMed ID: 12130761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case. Anderson A Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The secret world of animal experiments. Hampson J New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1816):24-7. PubMed ID: 11656118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Truth, fairness, and the definition of scientific misconduct. Grinnell F J Lab Clin Med; 1997 Feb; 129(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 9016854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Panel says U.S. may have done thousands of human radiation experiments. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Oct; ():10. PubMed ID: 11647046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hwang case review committee misses the mark. Rossner M J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry. Abbott A; Schwarz J Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters. Farthing MJ BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation tests were widespread: top officials knew of experiments, panel says. Lee G Washington Post; 1994 Oct; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical Research Council multi-centre trial of orchiectomy in carcinoma of the prostate; a follow-up: MRC trial of orchiectomy in carcinoma of the prostate. Nicholson RH IRB; 1986; 8(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11653765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire. Wadman M Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Panel suggests using inmates in drug trials. Urbina I N Y Times Web; 2006 Aug; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 16918009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. British editors form misconduct panel. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Guidelines produced for the use of transgenic animals in research. Newmark P Nature; 1989 Jan; 337(6205):295. PubMed ID: 2911374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]