These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11586884)

  • 41. The states' solutions.
    Moskowitz DB
    State Health Care Am; 2001; ():35-9. PubMed ID: 11521322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. US House passes patients' bill of rights.
    McLellan F
    Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9280):480. PubMed ID: 11513927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High noon on patient protection approaches in Washington.
    Texas Dental Association Department of Legislative and Regulatory Affairs
    Tex Dent J; 2000 Mar; 117(3):55-61. PubMed ID: 11857823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Backdoor reform.
    Betz R
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1998; 16(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 10177070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Seizing the initiative. Clinton, Democrats think electorate showed it's ready.
    Weissenstein E; Gardner J
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Nov; 28(45):2. PubMed ID: 10187308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Nursing home reform: fait accompli or frontier?
    Freeman IC
    J Aging Soc Policy; 1997; 9(2):7-18. PubMed ID: 10186882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patients' bills of rights get nods and nays.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Jun; 24(6):93-4. PubMed ID: 10537525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. President Clinton endorses Consumer Bill of Rights.
    J Trauma Nurs; 1998; 5(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 10188438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Managed care reform: how Texas pulled off what Washington can't.
    Carlson B
    Manag Care; 1999 Feb; 8(2):23-4. PubMed ID: 10346104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In Washington. Deadlock--or bipartisanship?
    Ward RD
    Mich Med; 2001; 100(3):25-6. PubMed ID: 11419271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. What's best for the patient?
    Waller D
    Time; 2001 Jul; 157(26):24-8. PubMed ID: 11447815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Consumer bill of rights will impact quality efforts.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1998 May; 5(5):71. PubMed ID: 10178968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Managed care under repair.
    Ortolon K
    Tex Med; 2001 Mar; 97(3):22-8. PubMed ID: 11320960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perspectives. Are unrealistic expectations confusing policy debate on Medicare HMOs?
    Cunningham R
    Med Health; 1999 Sep; 53(38):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10621132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Putting quality of health care on the political agenda.
    Feeg VD
    Pediatr Nurs; 1998; 24(2):110, 159. PubMed ID: 9697562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Patient's Bill of Rights: misfocused efforts and a missed opportunity?
    Lawrence D
    Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):75-6. PubMed ID: 11155651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Other issues before Congress.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Sep; 14(16):7. PubMed ID: 11366913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. President embraces quality commission's consumer "Bill of Rights".
    Am Nurse; 1997; 29(6):18-9. PubMed ID: 9444096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. National health care reform failure: the political economy perspective.
    Thai KV; Qiao Y; McManus SM
    J Health Hum Serv Adm; 1998; 21(2):236-59. PubMed ID: 10538065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Health care legislation: the outlook for 1995.
    Aldrich S; Oberman D
    HMO; 1995; 36(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 10152504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.