These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11587599)

  • 1. Randomized trial of amplification strategies.
    Yueh B; Souza PE; McDowell JA; Collins MP; Loovis CF; Hedrick SC; Ramsey SD; Deyo RA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Oct; 127(10):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11587599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Wilson RH; Dobie RA; Haskell GB; Bratt GW; Shanks JE; Stelmachowicz P; Studebaker GA; Boysen AE; Donahue A; Canalis R; Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(14):1806-13. PubMed ID: 11025833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
    Barker F; Mackenzie E; Elliott L; Jones S; de Lusignan S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD010342. PubMed ID: 25019297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional amplification and an assistive listening device in elderly persons.
    Jerger J; Chmiel R; Florin E; Pirozzolo F; Wilson N
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):490-504. PubMed ID: 8979037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial.
    Mulrow CD; Aguilar C; Endicott JE; Tuley MR; Velez R; Charlip WS; Rhodes MC; Hill JA; DeNino LA
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Aug; 113(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 2197909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid patients in private practice and public health (Veterans Affairs) clinics: are they different?
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):513-28. PubMed ID: 16377990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study.
    Gantz BJ; Perkins R; Murray M; Levy SC; Puria S
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):352-359. PubMed ID: 28005723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Randomized Control Trial: Supplementing Hearing Aid Use with Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Auditory Training.
    Saunders GH; Smith SL; Chisolm TH; Frederick MT; McArdle RA; Wilson RH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):381-96. PubMed ID: 26901263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics.
    Collins MP; Souza PE; Liu CF; Heagerty PJ; Amtmann D; Yueh B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Dec; 9():233. PubMed ID: 20003515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.
    Takahashi G; Martinez CD; Beamer S; Bridges J; Noffsinger D; Sugiura K; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):323-49. PubMed ID: 17580727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment--which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial.
    Yueh B; Collins MP; Souza PE; Boyko EJ; Loovis CF; Heagerty PJ; Liu CF; Hedrick SC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2010 Mar; 58(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20398111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
    Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.
    Chisolm TH; Noe CM; McArdle R; Abrams H
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Jun; 11(2):73-89. PubMed ID: 17494874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.