These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11587895)

  • 1. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of word length.
    Lavidor M; Ellis AW; Shillcock R; Bland T
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 12(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 11587895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
    Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
    Lavidor M; Walsh V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
    Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word length effects in Hebrew.
    Lavidor M; Whitney C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 15922165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parafoveal processing in word recognition.
    Kennedy A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 10881613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 9(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 19246332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2341-53. PubMed ID: 18723038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?
    Snell J; Vitu F; Grainger J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1984-1996. PubMed ID: 27457807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres: selective hemispheric activation and capacity limitations.
    Hellige JB; Cox PJ; Litvac L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Jun; 108(2):251-79. PubMed ID: 528905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating hemispheric divisions in processing fixated words: the evidence from Arabic.
    Jordan TR; Almabruk AA; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):992-7. PubMed ID: 21457952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.