571 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11588869)
1. The final Stark II rule: implications for hospital-physician arrangements.
Melvin DH; Polacheck JF
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):62-6. PubMed ID: 11588869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gainsharing: a cost-reduction strategy that may be back.
Reynolds M
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jan; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11806320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining the impact of the new Stark rules on joint ventures.
Washlick JR
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Nov; 62(11):48-52. PubMed ID: 18990836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical staff contracting: legal issues in physician-hospital arrangements.
Caesar NB
Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(4):39-54. PubMed ID: 10128459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Key changes to the Stark II final rule. Part 1.
Riley J; Pristave R
Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Dec; 21(12):70, 72. PubMed ID: 18038756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. OIG targets contractual joint ventures.
O'Hare PK
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Sep; 57(9):56-60. PubMed ID: 14503145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stark reality. How Stark I and II will impact physician relationships.
Avery PA; Wachler AB
Mich Health Hosp; 1995; 31(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 10151703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Update on hospital-physician relationships under Stark II.
Steiner JE
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Dec; 47(12):66-8, 70-2, 74-5. PubMed ID: 10145916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Stark" reality: self-referral rule holds risk and opportunity.
Lebowitz PH
Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 11680255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase I Stark II regulations provide some flexibility.
Chase L
Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Oct; 55(10):52-9. PubMed ID: 11588868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stark II final regulations: hot issues for physician practices.
Falk R; Hance A
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15523769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical applications of Stark II to hospital operations.
Higgins DB; Hayes ML
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 Dec; 47(12):76-8, 81, 83-5. PubMed ID: 10145917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physician refer thyself: is Stark II, phase III the final voyage?
Manchikanti L; McMahon EB
Pain Physician; 2007 Nov; 10(6):725-41. PubMed ID: 17987094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital-physician compensation methods under the Stark Act.
Becker S; Nino K
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():3-8. PubMed ID: 10351447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal issues in accepting capitation.
Marren JP; Hynes DW
Physician Exec; 1995 Jul; 21(7):15-20. PubMed ID: 10143965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician compensation arrangements under Stark proposed rule.
Cassidy M
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Mar; ():3-7. PubMed ID: 10177820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical staff contracting: legal structures and reimbursement opportunities.
Caesar NB
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 10122127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The physician incentive plan rule: reevaluating physician compensation arrangements.
Gauvreau E
Manag Care Interface; 1997 Sep; 10(9):62-4. PubMed ID: 10175545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical restraints: the proper analysis of physician agreements with health plans and hospitals.
Kopit WG
Hosp Law Newsl; 1993 Feb; 10(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 10123557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stark II and physician compensation models: integrating business and legal issues.
Pursell D; Marsh J; Thompson D; Potter K
J Health Law; 2005; 38(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 15968939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
