191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11590808)
1. Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.
Link RE; Morton RA
Urol Clin North Am; 2001 Aug; 28(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 11590808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer].
Peneau M; Villers A; Molinié V; Theis D; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 15373168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Fournier G; Gajendran V; Leidich R; Lo R; Wolf JS; Jacob G; Nicolaisen G; Palmer K; Freiha F
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 7524237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eliminating the need for per-operative frozen section analysis of pelvic lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy.
Bangma CH; Hop WC; Schröder FH
Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 8535678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.
Burkhard FC; Bader P; Schneider E; Markwalder R; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):84-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 12160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate carcinoma depends not only on tumor characteristics but also on surgical performance and extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Klevecka V; Musch M; Roggenbuck U; Stoerkel S; Kroepfl D
Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(8):601-8. PubMed ID: 18791337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen section diagnosis of metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma in pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with nomogram prediction of metastasis.
Beissner RS; Stricker JB; Speights VO; Coffield KS; Spiekerman AM; Riggs M
Urology; 2002 May; 59(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 11992847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the therapy of prostate and bladder cancer].
Heidenreich A; Ohlmann CH
Aktuelle Urol; 2005 Jun; 36(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16001337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011.
Eifler JB; Feng Z; Lin BM; Partin MT; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Trock BJ; Partin AW
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22834909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indications for laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in the staging of prostate cancer.
Patel MI; Katelaris PM
Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 7536410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.
Shackley DC; Irving SO; Brough WA; O'Reilly PH
BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 10233490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.
Rahman S; Cosmatos H; Dave G; Williams S; Tome M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):906-10. PubMed ID: 21300478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of staging lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.
El-Galley RE; Keane TE; Petros JA; Sanders WH; Clarke HS; Cotsonis GA; Graham SD
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):663-7. PubMed ID: 9763090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eliminating the need for bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in select patients with prostate cancer.
Bluestein DL; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1994 May; 151(5):1315-20. PubMed ID: 7512662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Outcome after radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for untreated high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer].
Tsurusaki T; Yamasaki Y; Maruta S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 May; 104(3):496-504. PubMed ID: 23819361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radical perineal prostatectomy without lymphadenectomy. Patients with cT1 + 2, G1 +2, PSA < or = 10 ng/ml prostate carcinoma].
Jakse G; Brehmer B; Wolff JM; Aretz R; Handt S
Urologe A; 1999 Mar; 38(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10231935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
