These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11590822)

  • 1. Different orthodontic treatment effects in Angle Class III patients.
    Tränkmann J; Lisson JA; Treutlein C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Sep; 62(5):327-36. PubMed ID: 11590822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective comparison of functional appliance treatment of Class III malocclusions in the deciduous and mixed dentitions.
    Baccetti T; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 9699409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthopedic Effect of Chin Cup during Mixed Dentition Stage.
    Al-Khalifa HN; Hashem MI; Alanazi KJ; Anil S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 May; 18(5):410-414. PubMed ID: 28512282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 15224055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of Reverse Twin-Block and Reverse Pull Face Mask on craniofacial morphology in early and late mixed dentition children.
    Fareen N; Alam MK; Khamis MF; Mokhtar N
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Aug; 20(3):134-139. PubMed ID: 28440029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in soft tissue profile during the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Kerr WJ; Ten Have TR
    Br J Orthod; 1987 Nov; 14(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 3481274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A case of skeletal Class III treated with a maxillary forward protractor in mixed dentition].
    Watanabe Y; Ishimoto K; Tsuka H; Yamauchi K
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1983 Jun; 15(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 6579118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Tollaro I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 9228845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment effects of two different appliances on pharyngeal airway space in mixed dentition Malay children.
    Fareen N; Alam MK; Khamis MF; Mokhtar N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():159-163. PubMed ID: 31323354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov; 126(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 15520688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of pseudo Class III malocclusion by modified Hawleys appliance with inverted labial bow.
    Negi KS; Sharma KR
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21521921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of pain and discomfort during early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Removable Mandibular Retractor Appliance.
    Saleh M; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 23758461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of Fränkel.
    Robertson NR
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Apr; 83(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 6573143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of simple fixed appliance and reverse headgear in correction of anterior crossbites.
    Gu Y; Rabie AB; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 10842112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The Bimzat skeletal activator in the treatment of Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions in the mixed dentition].
    Genone B
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Dec; 53(20):17-25, 29-32, 35-9 passim. PubMed ID: 3869560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of three appliance systems in the treatment of Class III malocclusion.
    Kerr WJ; Tenhave TR
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Aug; 10(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 3181299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficiency of compensatory orthodontic treatment of mild Class III malocclusion with two different bracket systems.
    Aragón MLC; Bichara LM; Flores-Mir C; Almeida G; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):49-55. PubMed ID: 29364379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.