These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11591269)

  • 1. So you think it won't affect you? Assisted conception, discrimination and the Human Rights Act.
    Blyth E
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2001; 4(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 11591269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern reproductive technologies. Legal issues concerning cryopreservation and posthumous conception.
    Shah M
    J Leg Med; 1996 Dec; 17(4):547-71. PubMed ID: 8991333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cloning and a right to procreate.
    Lebovitz RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(1):6. PubMed ID: 11917709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Human Rights Act 1998 and reproductive rights.
    Millns S
    Parliam Aff; 2001 Jul; 54(3):475-94. PubMed ID: 12449934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal and ethical aspects of new reproductive technologies; the case of prenatal diagnosis.
    Hendriks A
    Med Law; 1996; 15(4):677-89. PubMed ID: 9114709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Human Rights Act (1998) and its impact on reproductive issues.
    Bahadur G
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Apr; 16(4):785-9. PubMed ID: 11278235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legislative approaches to assisted reproduction.
    Dickens BM
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Aug; 11(7):327-31. PubMed ID: 7795363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Regulation of reproductive medicine in North America or the Wild West of Medicine (Part II)].
    Alkorta Idiakez I
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):41-89. PubMed ID: 15032098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rights of the embryo and the foetus in private law: the Italian experience.
    Mazzoni CM
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2002; (17):83-97. PubMed ID: 12703110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procreative liberty in the era of genomics.
    Robertson JA
    Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(4):439-87. PubMed ID: 15119245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gatekeeping and assisted reproductive technology. The ethical rights and responsibilities of doctors.
    Pearn JH
    Med J Aust; 1997 Sep; 167(6):318-20. PubMed ID: 9322778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The baby market.
    Lancet; 1997 May; 349(9064):1487. PubMed ID: 9167451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrongful life actions as a means of regulating use of genetic and reproductive technologies.
    Pattinson SD
    Health Law J; 1999; 7():19-32. PubMed ID: 11066363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproductive technology for procreation, experimentation, and profit. Protecting rights and setting limits.
    Garcia SA
    J Leg Med; 1990 Mar; 11(1):1-57. PubMed ID: 2277231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal issues in fertility treatment.
    McGleenan T
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2001; 4(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11719725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can doctors place limits on their medical practices?
    Capen K
    CMAJ; 1997 Mar; 156(6):839-40. PubMed ID: 9084391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human embryo experimentation: regulation and relative rights.
    Feiler CL
    Fordham Law Rev; 1998 May; 66(6):2435-69. PubMed ID: 10342917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Procreative liberty, embryos, and collaborative reproduction: a legal perspective.
    Robertson JA
    Women Health; 1987; 13(1-2):179-94. PubMed ID: 3332828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filiation is assisted reproduction: potential conflicts and legal implications.
    Shenfield F
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1348-54. PubMed ID: 7962447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The child as damage--physicians' liability in cases involving reproductive and prenatal medicine].
    Schreiber HL
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Jul; 96(6-7):423-9. PubMed ID: 12219496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.