104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11591637)
1. Evolutionarily conserved noncoding DNA in the human genome: how much and what for?
Meisler MH
Genome Res; 2001 Oct; 11(10):1617-8. PubMed ID: 11591637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Noncoding sequences conserved in a limited number of mammals in the SIM2 interval are frequently functional.
Frazer KA; Tao H; Osoegawa K; de Jong PJ; Chen X; Doherty MF; Cox DR
Genome Res; 2004 Mar; 14(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 14962988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences.
Bergman CM; Kreitman M
Genome Res; 2001 Aug; 11(8):1335-45. PubMed ID: 11483574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomics. Charting a genome's hills and valleys.
Pennisi E
Science; 2002 May; 296(5573):1601-3. PubMed ID: 12040163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans.
Prabhakar S; Noonan JP; Pääbo S; Rubin EM
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):786. PubMed ID: 17082449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetics. Genomic clues to DNA treasure sometimes lead nowhere.
Monroe D
Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5937):142-3. PubMed ID: 19589978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What controls the length of noncoding DNA?
Comeron JM
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2001 Dec; 11(6):652-9. PubMed ID: 11682309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-coding regulatory regions in genomes. Editorial.
Gomez Skarmeta JL
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2009 Jul; 8(4):213-4. PubMed ID: 19752043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of human chromosome 21 conserved nongenic sequences (CNGs) with the mouse and dog genomes shows that their selective constraint is independent of their genic environment.
Dermitzakis ET; Kirkness E; Schwarz S; Birney E; Reymond A; Antonarakis SE
Genome Res; 2004 May; 14(5):852-9. PubMed ID: 15078857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of recombination signal sequences in zebrafish.
Danilova N
Mol Immunol; 2005 Jun; 42(10):1243-9. PubMed ID: 15829313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomic analysis of vertebrate Hox3 and Hox4 genes.
Hadrys T; Prince V; Hunter M; Baker R; Rinkwitz S
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2004 Mar; 302(2):147-64. PubMed ID: 15054858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conserved non-genic sequences - an unexpected feature of mammalian genomes.
Dermitzakis ET; Reymond A; Antonarakis SE
Nat Rev Genet; 2005 Feb; 6(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 15716910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic characterization of a repetitive motif strongly associated with developmental genes in Drosophila.
Costas J; Vieira CP; Casares F; Vieira J
BMC Genomics; 2003 Dec; 4(1):52. PubMed ID: 14675495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of noncoding sequences of orthologous bovine and human gene pairs.
Miziara MN; Riggs PK; Amaral ME
Genet Mol Res; 2004 Dec; 3(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 15688313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conserved distances between vertebrate highly conserved elements.
Sun H; Skogerbø G; Chen R
Hum Mol Genet; 2006 Oct; 15(19):2911-22. PubMed ID: 16923797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for turnover of functional noncoding DNA in mammalian genome evolution.
Smith NG; Brandström M; Ellegren H
Genomics; 2004 Nov; 84(5):806-13. PubMed ID: 15475259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Biology of Genomes meeting. Disposable DNA puzzles researchers.
Pennisi E
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5677):1590-1. PubMed ID: 15192196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-scale appearance of ultraconserved elements in tetrapod genomes and slowdown of the molecular clock.
Stephen S; Pheasant M; Makunin IV; Mattick JS
Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Feb; 25(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 18056681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomics: Encyclopaedia of humble DNA.
Greally JM
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7146):782-3. PubMed ID: 17568731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surveying phylogenetic footprints in large gene clusters: applications to Hox cluster duplications.
Prohaska SJ; Fried C; Flamm C; Wagner GP; Stadler PF
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 May; 31(2):581-604. PubMed ID: 15062796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
