BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11592463)

  • 1. Withholding, seducing, and threatening: a pilot study of further attorney pressures on expert witnesses.
    Gutheil TG; Commons M; Miller PM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 11592463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The phantom expert: unconsented use of an expert's name and/or testimony, as a legal strategy.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Hilliard JT
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 11592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Telling tales out of court": a pilot study of experts' disclosures about opposing experts.
    Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Miller PM; LaLlave J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 11196255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attorneys' pressures on the expert witness: early warning signs of endangered honesty, objectivity, and fair compensation.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):546-53; discussion 554-62. PubMed ID: 10638783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expert witness travel dilemmas: a pilot study of billing practices.
    Gutheil TG; Slater FE; Commons ML; Goodheart EA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9554706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the preparation and use of psychiatric expert testimony: some suggestions in an ongoing controversy.
    Watson AS
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(2):226-46. PubMed ID: 708916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adventures in the twilight zone: empirical studies of the attorney-expert relationship.
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11302380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New code of ethics for Russian psychiatrists.
    Polubinskaya S; Bonnie R
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Apr; No. 117():13-9. PubMed ID: 11654571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethical confrontation of the unethical forensic colleague.
    Brodsky SL; McKinzey RK
    Prof Psychol; 2002 Jun; 33(3):307-9. PubMed ID: 15233125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry.
    American Academy of Psychiatry & Law
    Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; ():1-5. PubMed ID: 16944556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pejorative testimony about opposing experts and colleagues: "fouling one's own nest".
    Gutheil TG; Schetky DH; Simon RI
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16585231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public skepticism: forensic psychiatry's albatross.
    Weitzel WD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 616312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward the development of guidelines for the conduct of forensic psychiatric examinations.
    Simon RI; Wettstein RM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 9148880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are there impartial expert psychiatric witnesses?
    Gorman WF
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 6661568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The forensic psychiatrist as expert witness in malpractice cases.
    Zonana H
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 10638794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The forensic psychiatrist as expert witness in malpractice cases.
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):653-5. PubMed ID: 10638793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. President's message: The ethics of forensic psychiatry.
    Sidley NT
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(4):iv-viii. PubMed ID: 7284611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert witness billing practices revisited: a pilot study of further data.
    Gutheil TG; Commons ML; Miller PM
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 11471787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review of psychiatric expert testimony. American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 1421564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pilot Rasch scaling of lawyers' perceptions of expert bias.
    Dattilio FM; Commons ML; Adams KM; Gutheil TG; Sadoff RL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 17185478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.