These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11592545)

  • 1. Factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy.
    Shao JB; Wong F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Aug; 41(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 11592545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?
    Beck TL; Morse CB; Gray HJ; Goff BA; Urban RR; Liao JB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):348.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26470825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications in women aged 65 years or older: propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Lazzarini C; Ghezzi F
    Menopause; 2015 Jan; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 24977457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
    Blikkendaal MD; Schepers EM; van Zwet EW; Twijnstra AR; Jansen FW
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):723-38. PubMed ID: 25773357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-year review of hysterectomy morbidity and mortality: can we change direction?
    Varol N; Healey M; Tang P; Sheehan P; Maher P; Hill D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Aug; 41(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 11592544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical approach to hysterectomy and barriers to using minimally invasive methods.
    Janda M; Armfield NR; Kerr G; Kurz S; Jackson G; Currie J; Page K; Weaver E; Yazdani A; Obermair A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Dec; 58(6):690-695. PubMed ID: 29763509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
    Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Race/Ethnicity with Surgical Route and Perioperative Outcomes of Hysterectomy for Leiomyomas.
    Ko JS; Suh CH; Huang H; Zhuo H; Harmanli O; Zhang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 28(7):1403-1410.e2. PubMed ID: 33242598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vaginal hysterectomy in generally considered contraindications to vaginal surgery.
    Paparella P; Sizzi O; Rossetti A; De Benedittis F; Paparella R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Sep; 270(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 12856131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
    Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.
    Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Route of hysterectomy: a retrospective, cohort study in English NHS Hospitals from 2011 to 2017.
    Madhvani K; Curnow T; Carpenter T
    BJOG; 2019 May; 126(6):795-802. PubMed ID: 30461181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
    Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opioid Prescription and Patient Use After Gynecologic Procedures: A Survey of Patients and Providers.
    Griffith KC; Clark NV; Zuckerman AL; Ferzandi TR; Wright KN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):684-688. PubMed ID: 29154933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.
    Gross CP; Nicholson W; Powe NR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 94(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 10576183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
    Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD003677. PubMed ID: 15674911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: weigh harms, but do not dismiss benefits.
    Nygaard I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):553-5. PubMed ID: 25925627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7800317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.