These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11592661)

  • 1. Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.
    Ho G; Scialfa CT; Caird JK; Graw T
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 11592661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Age differences in visual search for traffic signs during a simulated conversation.
    McPhee LC; Scialfa CT; Dennis WM; Ho G; Caird JK
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 15709329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes.
    McCarley JS; Vais MJ; Pringle H; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(3):424-36. PubMed ID: 15573543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relation between driving experience and recognition of road signs relative to their locations.
    Borowsky A; Shinar D; Parmet Y
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 18516830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing pedestrians at night: visual clutter does not mask biological motion.
    Tyrrell RA; Wood JM; Chaparro A; Carberry TP; Chu BS; Marszalek RP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 19393800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Older observers' tolerance of optical blur: age differences in the identification of defocused text signs.
    Kline DW; Buck K; Sell Y; Bolan TL; Dewar RE
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 10665204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye movements of younger and older drivers.
    Maltz M; Shinar D
    Hum Factors; 1999 Mar; 41(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 10354803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does the driver look at? The influence of intersection characteristics on attention allocation and driving behavior.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():610-9. PubMed ID: 22269548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test.
    Scialfa CT; Borkenhagen D; Lyon J; Deschênes M; Horswill M; Wetton M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():547-53. PubMed ID: 22269541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The combination of two training approaches to improve older adults' driving safety.
    Bédard M; Porter MM; Marshall S; Isherwood I; Riendeau J; Weaver B; Tuokko H; Molnar F; Miller-Polgar J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Mar; 9(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18338298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.
    Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 26189873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A yellow filter improves response times to low-contrast targets and traffic hazards.
    Lacherez P; Saeri AK; Wood JM; Atchison DA; Horswill MS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 23400022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural image clutter degrades overt search performance independently of set size.
    Semizer Y; Michel MM
    J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):1. PubMed ID: 30933237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing motorcycles attention and search conspicuity by using Alternating-Blinking Lights System (ABLS).
    Gershon P; Shinar D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():801-10. PubMed ID: 22884378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of visibility conditions, traffic density, and navigational challenge on speed compensation and driving performance in older adults.
    Trick LM; Toxopeus R; Wilson D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1661-71. PubMed ID: 20728615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age, cognitive style, and traffic signs.
    Lambert LD; Fleury M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Apr; 78(2):611-24. PubMed ID: 8022689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are car daytime running lights detrimental to motorcycle conspicuity?
    Cavallo V; Pinto M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():78-85. PubMed ID: 23036385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using reflective clothing to enhance the conspicuity of bicyclists at night.
    Wood JM; Tyrrell RA; Marszalek R; Lacherez P; Carberry T; Chu BS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():726-30. PubMed ID: 22269563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conversation limits the functional field of view.
    Atchley P; Dressel J
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):664-73. PubMed ID: 15709328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age differences in search of web pages: the effects of link size, link number, and clutter.
    Grahame M; Laberge J; Scialfa CT
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(3):385-98. PubMed ID: 15573540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.