215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11593020)
1. Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex.
Kondrashov FA; Kondrashov AS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Oct; 98(21):12089-92. PubMed ID: 11593020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations.
Johnson T; Barton NH
Genetics; 2002 Sep; 162(1):395-411. PubMed ID: 12242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genome structure and the benefit of sex.
Watson RA; Weinreich DM; Wakeley J
Evolution; 2011 Feb; 65(2):523-36. PubMed ID: 21029076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
Charlesworth B
Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate of adaptation in sexuals and asexuals: a solvable model of the Fisher-Muller effect.
Park SC; Krug J
Genetics; 2013 Nov; 195(3):941-55. PubMed ID: 23979572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The advantage of recombination when selection is acting at many genetic Loci.
Hickey DA; Golding GB
J Theor Biol; 2018 Apr; 442():123-128. PubMed ID: 29355539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Condition-dependent sex and the rate of adaptation.
Hadany L; Otto SP
Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S71-8. PubMed ID: 19459778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of Mutation Rates in Rapidly Adapting Asexual Populations.
Good BH; Desai MM
Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1249-1266. PubMed ID: 27646140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution.
McDonald MJ; Rice DP; Desai MM
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):233-6. PubMed ID: 26909573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epistasis, pleiotropy, and the mutation load in sexual and asexual populations.
Roze D; Blanckaert A
Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 24372600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populations.
Gray JC; Goddard MR
BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Mar; 12():43. PubMed ID: 22462622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environments.
Becks L; Agrawal AF
PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(5):e1001317. PubMed ID: 22563299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes.
de Visser JA; Park SC; Krug J
Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S15-30. PubMed ID: 19456267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facultative sexual reproduction under frequency-dependent selection on a single locus.
Yamauchi A; Kamite Y
J Theor Biol; 2003 Apr; 221(3):411-24. PubMed ID: 12642116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
MacCarthy T; Bergman A
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of epistasis and pleiotropy on evolutionary adaptation.
Ostman B; Hintze A; Adami C
Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jan; 279(1727):247-56. PubMed ID: 21697174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complementation, genetic conflict, and the evolution of sex and recombination.
Archetti M
J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S21-33. PubMed ID: 20200138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Liberating genetic variance through sex.
Peters AD; Otto SP
Bioessays; 2003 Jun; 25(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 12766942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The competition between simple and complex evolutionary trajectories in asexual populations.
Ochs IE; Desai MM
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():55. PubMed ID: 25881244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
