These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11594378)

  • 1. Reverse osmosis filtration for space mission wastewater: membrane properties and operating conditions.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Feb; 182(1-2):77-90. PubMed ID: 11594378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a reverse osmosis membrane system for recycling space mission wastewater.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 2000; 7(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 11676440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Water recovery in space.
    Tamponnet C; Savage CJ; Amblard P; Lasserre JC; Personne JC; Germain JC
    ESA Bull; 1999 Mar; 97(5):56-60. PubMed ID: 11725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the influence of temperature on degree of concentration polarization in reverse osmosis systems.
    Agashichev SP
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):319-26. PubMed ID: 16003992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
    Zhou W; Song L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adsorption processes in spacecraft environmental control and life support systems.
    DallBauman LA; Finn JE
    Stud Surf Sci Catal; 1999; 120():455-71. PubMed ID: 12741388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Membrane rejection of nitrogen compounds.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jul; 35(14):3008-18. PubMed ID: 11478256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the vapor phase catalytic ammonia removal process for use in a Mars transit vehicle.
    Flynn M; Borchers B
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 1998; 5(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 11871448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of operating conditions on the separation of ammonium and nitrate ions with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Koyuncu I
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2002 Aug; 37(7):1347-59. PubMed ID: 15328697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Removal of heavy metals from aluminum anodic oxidation wastewaters by membrane filtration.
    Ates N; Uzal N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(22):22259-22272. PubMed ID: 29804256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Membrane filtration for tertiary treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry.
    Mänttäri M; Nyström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):99-107. PubMed ID: 17486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.