These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11595045)

  • 21. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.
    Goudet J; Büchi L
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1337-47. PubMed ID: 16322514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.
    Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Nov; 47():89. PubMed ID: 26576649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows.
    Germain RR; Wolak ME; Arcese P; Losdat S; Reid JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Nov; 85(6):1613-1624. PubMed ID: 27448623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On estimating non-additive genetic parameters in chickens.
    Silva MA; Berger PJ; Nordskog AW
    Br Poult Sci; 1976 Sep; 17(5):525-38. PubMed ID: 963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
    Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic basis of heterosis for yield and yield components explored by QTL mapping across four genetic populations in upland cotton.
    Li C; Zhao T; Yu H; Li C; Deng X; Dong Y; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Mei L; Chen J; Zhu S
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):910. PubMed ID: 30541432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implementation of the Realized Genomic Relationship Matrix to Open-Pollinated White Spruce Family Testing for Disentangling Additive from Nonadditive Genetic Effects.
    Gamal El-Dien O; Ratcliffe B; Klápště J; Porth I; Chen C; El-Kassaby YA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Jan; 6(3):743-53. PubMed ID: 26801647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Willham RL; Northcutt SL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 7628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The quantitative genetics of fluctuating asymmetry: a comparison of two models.
    Roff D; Réale D
    Evolution; 2004 Jan; 58(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 15058718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins.
    Hoeschele I
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 May; 74(5):1743-52. PubMed ID: 1880275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of genetic drift on the variance/covariance components generated by multilocus additive x additive epistatic systems.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Mar; 239(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 16242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R.
    Duangjinda M; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Druet T
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2997-3001. PubMed ID: 11811452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Permanency of response to selection for quantitative characters in finite populations.
    Cockerham CC; Tachida H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1988 Mar; 85(5):1563-5. PubMed ID: 3422750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative trait loci and gene interaction: the quantitative genetics of metapopulations.
    Goodnight CJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 May; 84 ( Pt 5)():587-98. PubMed ID: 10849084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant.
    Winn AA
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 17(5):1073-83. PubMed ID: 15312079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variability and inbreeding in semiexotic maize populations.
    Oliveira AS; Miranda Filho JB; Reis EF
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Feb; 14(1):1184-99. PubMed ID: 25730057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of dominance components in noninbred populations by using additive animal model residuals.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(4):471-88. PubMed ID: 12441632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.