These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11595091)

  • 1. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
    Lavie N; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A psychophysical study of visual extinction: ipsilesional distractor interference with contralesional orientation thresholds in visual hemineglect patients.
    Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 15716143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial gradient for unique-feature detection in patients with unilateral neglect: evidence from auditory and visual search.
    Eramudugolla R; Mattingley JB
    Neurocase; 2008; 15(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19031339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli.
    Ptak R; Schnider A
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 15901652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing.
    Wilson DE; Muroi M; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):319-35. PubMed ID: 21299322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repetitive exploration towards locations that no longer carry a target in patients with neglect.
    Nys GM; Stuart M; Dijkerman HC
    J Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 4(Pt 1):33-45. PubMed ID: 19338727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect.
    Bartolomeo P; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Azouvi P; Chokron S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15949509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abnormally speeded saccades to ipsilesional targets in patients with spatial neglect.
    Natale E; Marzi CA; Bricolo E; Johannsen L; Karnath HO
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 16973180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.