These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11595103)

  • 1. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Robaye L; Pirenne D; Crommelinck M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):1019-34. PubMed ID: 11595103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing. A PET study.
    Nakamura K; Kawashima R; Sato N; Nakamura A; Sugiura M; Kato T; Hatano K; Ito K; Fukuda H; Schormann T; Zilles K
    Brain; 2000 Sep; 123 ( Pt 9)():1903-12. PubMed ID: 10960054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The functionally defined right occipital and fusiform "face areas" discriminate novel from visually familiar faces.
    Rossion B; Schiltz C; Crommelinck M
    Neuroimage; 2003 Jul; 19(3):877-83. PubMed ID: 12880816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces.
    Dubois S; Rossion B; Schiltz C; Bodart JM; Michel C; Bruyer R; Crommelinck M
    Neuroimage; 1999 Mar; 9(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 10075898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces. The effect of covert and overt face learning.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 20483817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct comparison of the neural substrates of recognition memory for words and faces.
    Kim JJ; Andreasen NC; O'Leary DS; Wiser AK; Ponto LL; Watkins GL; Hichwa RD
    Brain; 1999 Jun; 122 ( Pt 6)():1069-83. PubMed ID: 10356060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face familiarity, distinctiveness, and categorical perception.
    Angeli A; Davidoff J; Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):690-707. PubMed ID: 17853232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Broadly tuned face representation in older adults assessed by categorical perception.
    Lee Y; Smith CR; Grady CL; Hoang N; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1060-71. PubMed ID: 24490946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in face-selective regions other than the fusiform face area.
    Ramon M; Dricot L; Rossion B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 32(9):1587-98. PubMed ID: 20880360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition.
    Platek SM; Kemp SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):849-58. PubMed ID: 19159636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence.
    Eger E; Schweinberger SR; Dolan RJ; Henson RN
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1128-39. PubMed ID: 15961049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The modulatory effect of semantic familiarity on the audiovisual integration of face-name pairs.
    Li Y; Wang F; Huang B; Yang W; Yu T; Talsma D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Dec; 37(12):4333-4348. PubMed ID: 27401122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex.
    Ewbank MP; Andrews TJ
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 40(4):1857-70. PubMed ID: 18343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity.
    Natu VS; O'Toole AJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():151-9. PubMed ID: 25524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
    Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Activation reduction in anterior temporal cortices during repeated recognition of faces of personal acquaintances.
    Sugiura M; Kawashima R; Nakamura K; Sato N; Nakamura A; Kato T; Hatano K; Schormann T; Zilles K; Sato K; Ito K; Fukuda H
    Neuroimage; 2001 May; 13(5):877-90. PubMed ID: 11304083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.