152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11596810)
1. Effects of the testing situation on item responding: cause for concern.
Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Chan KY; Lee WC; Drasgow F
J Appl Psychol; 2001 Oct; 86(5):943-53. PubMed ID: 11596810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L; Tolvanen A; Feldt T
Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 21752026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining faking on personality inventories using unfolding item response theory models.
Scherbaum CA; Sabet J; Kern MJ; Agnello P
J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 23030769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.
Khorramdel L; Kubinger KD; Uitz A
Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 24811884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Psychometric Costs of Applicants' Faking: Examining Measurement Invariance and Retest Correlations Across Response Conditions.
Krammer G; Sommer M; Arendasy ME
J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(5):510-523. PubMed ID: 28300431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.
Barrick MR; Mount MK
J Appl Psychol; 1996 Jun; 81(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 8690688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking.
van Hooft EA; Born MP
J Appl Psychol; 2012 Mar; 97(2):301-16. PubMed ID: 21967296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retesting personality in employee selection: implications of the context, sample, and setting.
Holladay CL; David E; Johnson SK
Psychol Rep; 2013 Apr; 112(2):486-501. PubMed ID: 23833877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of subtle and obvious scales to detect faking on the MCMI-II.
Wierzbicki M
J Clin Psychol; 1997 Aug; 53(5):421-6. PubMed ID: 9257219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures.
McFarland LA; Ryan AM
J Appl Psychol; 2000 Oct; 85(5):812-21. PubMed ID: 11055152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.
Landers RN; Sackett PR; Tuzinski KA
J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 20718510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Item-Level Analysis for Detecting Faking on Personality Tests: Appropriateness of Ideal Point Item Response Theory Models.
Liu J; Zhang J
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3090. PubMed ID: 32038431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Instructed faking and MMPI-2 response latencies: the potential for assessing response validity.
Brunetti DG; Schlottmann RS; Scott AB; Mihura JL
J Clin Psychol; 1998 Feb; 54(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9467758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction for faking in self-report personality tests.
Sjöberg L
Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 26043667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-presentation dynamics on overt integrity tests: experimental studies of the Reid Report.
Cunningham MR; Wong DT; Barbee AP
J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):643-58. PubMed ID: 7989274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deliberate faking on personality and emotional intelligence measures.
Hartman NS; Grubb WL
Psychol Rep; 2011 Feb; 108(1):120-38. PubMed ID: 21526598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity?
Holden RR; Wood LL; Tomashewski L
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jul; 81(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 11474721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
