These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11596810)

  • 41. To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.
    Law SJ; Bourdage J; O'Neill TA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1771. PubMed ID: 27895609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple industries.
    Fine S
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Oct; 107(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 21117489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Personality comparison of airline pilot incumbents, applicants, and the general population norms on the 16PF.
    Wakcher S; Cross K; Blackman MC
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 1):773-80. PubMed ID: 12841441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. MMPI validity measures: a comparative study of original with alternative indices.
    Woychyshyn CA; McElheran WG; Romney DM
    J Pers Assess; 1992 Feb; 58(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 1545338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Note on concurrent validation of the personality assessment inventory in law enforcement.
    Hays JR
    Psychol Rep; 1997 Aug; 81(1):244-6. PubMed ID: 9293213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Personnel selection as a signaling game.
    Bangerter A; Roulin N; König CJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jul; 97(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 22040263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Testing the efficacy of a new procedure for reducing faking on personality tests within selection contexts.
    Fan J; Gao D; Carroll SA; Lopez FJ; Tian TS; Meng H
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Jul; 97(4):866-80. PubMed ID: 22250667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Five Factor Biodata Inventory: resistance to faking.
    Sisco H; Reilly RR
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Aug; 101(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 17958100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in a forensic inpatient sample.
    Bagby RM; Rogers R; Buis T
    J Pers Assess; 1994 Apr; 62(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 8189330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can Faking Be Measured With Dedicated Validity Scales? Within-Subject Trifactor Mixture Modeling Applied to BIDR Responses.
    Guenole N; Brown A; Lim V
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 35786013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical utility of the McVaugh and Grow rules for the detection of faking on the Personality Inventory for Children.
    Forbes GB
    J Clin Psychol; 1984 Sep; 40(5):1205-9. PubMed ID: 6490918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Faking good on the MCMI-III: implications for child custody evaluations.
    Lenny P; Dear GE
    J Pers Assess; 2009 Nov; 91(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 19838905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neural correlates of self-deception and impression-management.
    Farrow TF; Burgess J; Wilkinson ID; Hunter MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 67():159-74. PubMed ID: 25527112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The detection of malingering and deception with a short form of the MMPI-2 based on the L, F, and K scales.
    Cassisi JE; Workman DE
    J Clin Psychol; 1992 Jan; 48(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 1556216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the Impact of Faking on Binary Personality Measures: An IRT-Based Multiple-Group Factor Analytic Procedure.
    Ferrando PJ; Anguiano-Carrasco C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2009 Jul; 44(4):497-524. PubMed ID: 26735594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The "g" in Faking: Doublethink the Validity of Personality Self-Report Measures for Applicant Selection.
    Geiger M; Olderbak S; Sauter R; Wilhelm O
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2153. PubMed ID: 30483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Detection of Faking Good on the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4.
    Bagby RM; Pajouhandeh P
    Assessment; 1997 Sep; 4(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 26613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adjectives vs. Statements in Forced Choice and Likert Item Types: Which Is More Resistant to Impression Management in Personality Assessment?
    Walton KE; Radunzel J; Moore R; Burrus J; Anguiano-Carrasco C; Murano D
    J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(6):842-853. PubMed ID: 33533652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.
    Heggestad ED; Morrison M; Reeve CL; McCloy RA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 16435935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.