These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11598584)

  • 1. Impact of conventional tomography on prediction of the appropriate implant size.
    Schropp L; Wenzel A; Kostopoulos L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Oct; 92(4):458-63. PubMed ID: 11598584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 21054555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 19221809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the pre-surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography.
    Diniz AF; Mendonça EF; Leles CR; Guilherme AS; Cavalcante MP; Silva MA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 18237315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
    Gher ME; Richardson AC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
    Voitik AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical application of spiral tomography in anterior implant placement: case report.
    Dixon DR; Morgan R; Hollender LG; Roberts FA; O'Neal RB
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1202-9. PubMed ID: 12416780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.
    Kim YK; Park JY; Kim SG; Kim JS; Kim JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 21239569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12498461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.
    Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 17697000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method of gauging dental radiographs during treatment planning for dental implants.
    Anil S; Al-Ghamdi HS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):82-8. PubMed ID: 17846675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant treatment planning using a patient acceptance prosthesis, radiographic record base, and surgical template. Part 1: Presurgical phase.
    Amet EM; Ganz SD
    Implant Dent; 1997; 6(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 9477783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preoperative planning for the placement of a single implant].
    Jacobs R
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 May; 106(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 11930365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.