These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11599873)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Computer-assisted Speech Perception Assessment Test (CASPA).
    Mackersie CL; Boothroyd A; Minniear D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Sep; 12(8):390-6. PubMed ID: 11599873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Large-corpus phoneme and word recognition and the generality of lexical context in CVC word perception.
    Gelfand JT; Christie RE; Gelfand SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):297-307. PubMed ID: 24687475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlist equivalency of the CID W-22 word lists presented in quiet and in noise.
    Loven FC; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 6840418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interlist equivalency of the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in quiet and noise with adult hearing-impaired individuals.
    Stockley KB; Green WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Feb; 11(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 10685675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Rakszawski B; Wright R; Cadieux JH; Davidson LS; Brenner C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A demonstration of improved precision of word recognition scores.
    Schlauch RS; Anderson ES; Micheyl C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):543-55. PubMed ID: 24686502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Boothroyd A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1339-50. PubMed ID: 17604127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance-intensity functions for normal-hearing adults and children using computer-aided speech perception assessment.
    McCreery R; Ito R; Spratford M; Lewis D; Hoover B; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19773658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; Oyler AL
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.