423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11601768)
1. Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment.
Betti LV; Bramante CM
Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):514-9. PubMed ID: 11601768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of efficacy and cleaning ability of hand and rotary devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment: an in vitro study.
Reddy N; Admala SR; Dinapadu S; Pasari S; Reddy MP; Rao MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24309341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Quantec rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal.
Bramante CM; Betti LV
Int Endod J; 2000 Sep; 33(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 11307465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals.
Marfisi K; Mercade M; Plotino G; Duran-Sindreu F; Bueno R; Roig M
Int Endod J; 2010 Nov; 43(11):1022-8. PubMed ID: 20726911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ProTaper and Mtwo retreatment systems in the removal of resin-based root canal obturation materials during retreatment.
Iriboz E; Sazak Öveçoğlu H
Aust Endod J; 2014 Apr; 40(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 24697958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment.
Imura N; Kato AS; Hata GI; Uemura M; Toda T; Weine F
Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 11307212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Meyer KM; Hermanns P; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT
Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 16454796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment instrumentation to remove single gutta-percha cones cemented with several endodontic sealers.
Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Dinçol ME; Dağlaroğlu R
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):756-62. PubMed ID: 22432937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of Profile .04 taper series 29 in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment--an in vitro study.
Betti LV; Bramante CM; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19717318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent.
Takahashi CM; Cunha RS; de Martin AS; Fontana CE; Silveira CF; da Silveira Bueno CE
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1580-3. PubMed ID: 19840652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of ProFile .04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment.
Sae-Lim V; Rajamanickam I; Lim BK; Lee HL
J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 11194370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus radiographic evaluation.
Kfir A; Tsesis I; Yakirevich E; Matalon S; Abramovitz I
Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 21899565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of GPX with or without solvent and hand files in removing filling materials from root canals--an ex vivo study.
Betti LV; Bramante CM; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N; Garcia RB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 20955955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of Different Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Removing Gutta-percha during Root Canal Retreatment.
Özyürek T; Demiryürek EÖ
J Endod; 2016 Apr; 42(4):646-9. PubMed ID: 26898565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.
Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
