These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11601773)

  • 1. A new in vitro model for the study of microbial microleakage around dental restorations: a preliminary qualitative evaluation.
    Matharu S; Spratt DA; Pratten J; Ng YL; Mordan N; Wilson M; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 11601773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model.
    Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T; Cury JA; Ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19321986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bacteria in the cavity-restoration interface after varying periods of clinical service - SEM description of distribution and 16S rRNA gene sequence identification of isolates.
    Arora RK; Mordan NJ; Spratt DA; Ng YL; Gulabivala K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):5029-5044. PubMed ID: 35359188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments.
    Cehreli SB; Arhun N; Celik C
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 20533635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study into the corrosion of intra-oral magnets in the presence of dental amalgam.
    Noar JH; Evans RD; Wilson D; Costello J; Ioannou E; Ayeni A; Mordan NJ; Wilson M; Pratten J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):615-9. PubMed ID: 14700268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonding of amalgam to dentine: microleakage and shear bond strength evaluation.
    van der Vyver PJ; de Wet FA; Kearney WD; de Nysschen D
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Aug; 51(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 9461930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a resin lining and rebonding on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Dutton FB; Summitt JB; Chan DC; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8425985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Dérand T; Birkhed D; Edwardsson S
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 1876980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and SEM interfacial micromorphology of amalgam restorations using three adhesive systems.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 10856807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM; St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of microleakage and fluoride on enamel-dentine demineralization around restorations.
    Cenci MS; Tenuta LM; Pereira-Cenci T; Del Bel Cury AA; ten Cate JM; Cury JA
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 18753749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.