BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11602011)

  • 1. Verification of the accuracy of 3D calculations of breast dose during tangential irradiation: measurements in a breast phantom.
    Kirsner SM; Prado KL; Tailor RC; Bencomo JA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 11602011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitor unit calculation for tangential breast treatments: verification in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Howlett SJ; Kron T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 12132946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
    Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification.
    Bencomo JA; Chu C; Tello VM; Cho SH; Ibbott GS
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 15753932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
    Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent calculations to validate monitor units from ADAC treatment planning system.
    Ayyangar KM; Saw CB; Gearheart D; Shen B; Thompson R
    Med Dosim; 2003; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12804704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
    Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional heart dose reconstruction to estimate normal tissue complication probability after breast irradiation using portal dosimetry.
    Louwe RJ; Wendling M; van Herk MB; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1354-63. PubMed ID: 17500466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
    Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
    Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of two- and three-dimensional photon dose calculation for tangential irradiation of the breast.
    Davis JB; Pfäfflin A; Cozzi AF
    Radiother Oncol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 9155073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
    Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional portal image-based dose reconstruction in a virtual phantom for rapid evaluation of IMRT plans.
    Ansbacher W
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3369-82. PubMed ID: 17022233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of radiation dose delivered by cone beam CT and tomosynthesis employed for setup of external breast irradiation.
    Winey B; Zygmanski P; Lyatskaya Y
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):164-73. PubMed ID: 19235385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional dose verification for intensity modulated radiation therapy using optical CT based polymer gel dosimetry.
    Wuu CS; Xu Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1412-9. PubMed ID: 16752577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a novel robot-assisted 3DUS system for real-time planning and guidance of breast interstitial HDR brachytherapy.
    Poulin E; Gardi L; Barker K; Montreuil J; Fenster A; Beaulieu L
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6830-9. PubMed ID: 26632040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.