These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11602084)

  • 1. [Impact of meta-analysis in clinical practice: the example of psychiatry].
    Ceballos C; García-Campayo J; Artal A; Valdizán JR
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2001; 29(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 11602084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Why evidence-based medicine? 20 years of meta-analysis].
    Ceballos C; Valdizán JR; Artal A; Almárcegui C; Allepuz C; García Campayo J; Fernández Liesa R; Giraldo P; Puértolas T
    An Med Interna; 2000 Oct; 17(10):521-6. PubMed ID: 11109646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Lemeshow AR; Blum RE; Berlin JA; Stoto MA; Colditz GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 16085190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Published books on pain and its treatment in Spain. Analysis with the ISBN database].
    Guardiola E; Baños JE
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1995 Apr; 42(4):119-24. PubMed ID: 7784684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment of collagenous colitis. An analysis of a systematic Cochrane review].
    Nielsen OH; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Aug; 165(33):3154-6. PubMed ID: 12968410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Spanish production of research articles on diagnostic imaging in cardiology and radiology (1994-1998)].
    Miguel-Dasit A; Martí-Bonmatí L; Aleixandre R; Sanfeliu P; Valderrama JC
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):806-14. PubMed ID: 15373986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.
    Mantzoukas S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):479-89. PubMed ID: 19187934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
    Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others.
    Nieminen P; Rucker G; Miettunen J; Carpenter J; Schumacher M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):939-46. PubMed ID: 17689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
    McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Speight PM
    Community Dent Health; 2004 Jun; 21(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15228202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.
    Colthart I; Bagnall G; Evans A; Allbutt H; Haig A; Illing J; McKinstry B
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 18464136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.