BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11602084)

  • 1. [Impact of meta-analysis in clinical practice: the example of psychiatry].
    Ceballos C; García-Campayo J; Artal A; Valdizán JR
    Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2001; 29(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 11602084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Why evidence-based medicine? 20 years of meta-analysis].
    Ceballos C; Valdizán JR; Artal A; Almárcegui C; Allepuz C; García Campayo J; Fernández Liesa R; Giraldo P; Puértolas T
    An Med Interna; 2000 Oct; 17(10):521-6. PubMed ID: 11109646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Lemeshow AR; Blum RE; Berlin JA; Stoto MA; Colditz GA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):867-73. PubMed ID: 16085190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Published books on pain and its treatment in Spain. Analysis with the ISBN database].
    Guardiola E; Baños JE
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1995 Apr; 42(4):119-24. PubMed ID: 7784684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
    Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment of collagenous colitis. An analysis of a systematic Cochrane review].
    Nielsen OH; Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Aug; 165(33):3154-6. PubMed ID: 12968410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Spanish production of research articles on diagnostic imaging in cardiology and radiology (1994-1998)].
    Miguel-Dasit A; Martí-Bonmatí L; Aleixandre R; Sanfeliu P; Valderrama JC
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):806-14. PubMed ID: 15373986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.
    Mantzoukas S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):479-89. PubMed ID: 19187934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].
    Donato HM; De Oliveira CF
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 17234084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others.
    Nieminen P; Rucker G; Miettunen J; Carpenter J; Schumacher M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):939-46. PubMed ID: 17689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology: a review of practice.
    McElvenny DM; Armstrong BG; Järup L; Higgins JP
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Speight PM
    Community Dent Health; 2004 Jun; 21(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15228202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
    Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
    Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.
    Colthart I; Bagnall G; Evans A; Allbutt H; Haig A; Illing J; McKinstry B
    Med Teach; 2008; 30(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 18464136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.