190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11603422)
1. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.
Swisher SG; Deford L; Merriman KW; Walsh GL; Smythe R; Vaporicyan A; Ajani JA; Brown T; Komaki R; Roth JA; Putnam JB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Jun; 119(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 10838528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland.
Dimick JB; Cattaneo SM; Lipsett PA; Pronovost PJ; Heitmiller RF
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Aug; 72(2):334-9; discussion 339-41. PubMed ID: 11515862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is It Time to Centralize High-risk Cancer Care in the United States? Comparison of Outcomes of Esophagectomy Between England and the United States.
Munasinghe A; Markar SR; Mamidanna R; Darzi AW; Faiz OD; Hanna GB; Low DE
Ann Surg; 2015 Jul; 262(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 24979602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of esophagectomy at academic centers: an association between volume and outcome.
Reavis KM; Smith BR; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):939-43. PubMed ID: 18942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Excess Cost and Predictive Factors of Esophagectomy Complications in the SEER-Medicare Database.
Jiang R; Liu Y; Ward KC; Force SD; Pickens A; Sancheti MS; Javidfar J; Fernandez FG; Khullar OV
Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Nov; 106(5):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 29944881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accordion severity grading system: assessment of relationship between costs, length of hospital stay, and survival in patients with complications after esophagectomy for cancer.
Carrott PW; Markar SR; Kuppusamy MK; Traverso LW; Low DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Sep; 215(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 22683069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Costs and benefits of different methods of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yanasoot A; Yolsuriyanwong K; Ruangsin S; Laohawiriyakamol S; Sunpaweravong S
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2017; 25(7-8):513-517. PubMed ID: 28871799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ICU nurse-to-patient ratio is associated with complications and resource use after esophagectomy.
Amaravadi RK; Dimick JB; Pronovost PJ; Lipsett PA
Intensive Care Med; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1857-62. PubMed ID: 11271096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resource utilization in esophagectomy: When higher costs are associated with worse outcomes.
Gaitonde SG; Hanseman DJ; Wima K; Sutton JM; Wilson GC; Sussman JJ; Ahmad SA; Shah SA; Abbott DE
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 112(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 26186718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data.
Wouters MW; Wijnhoven BP; Karim-Kos HE; Blaauwgeers HG; Stassen LP; Steup WH; Tilanus HW; Tollenaar RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Jan; 15(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18004627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Nayyar A; Herbella FAM; Cairns BA; Patti MG
J Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 229():9-14. PubMed ID: 29937021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standardized clinical care pathways for major thoracic cases reduce hospital costs.
Zehr KJ; Dawson PB; Yang SC; Heitmiller RF
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Sep; 66(3):914-9. PubMed ID: 9768951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
