BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11603889)

  • 1. Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic.
    Meagher T; Sukumar VP; Collingwood J; Crawley T; Schofield D; Henson J; Lakin K; Connolly D; Giles J
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Nov; 56(11):873-6. PubMed ID: 11603889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.
    Liu W; Esler SJ; Kenny BJ; Goh RH; Rainbow AJ; Stevenson GW
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 10751467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic--is the radiation dose justifiable?
    Denton ER; Mackenzie A; Greenwell T; Popert R; Rankin SC
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Jul; 54(7):444-7. PubMed ID: 10437695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute renal colic: value of unenhanced spiral computed tomography compared with intravenous urography.
    Wong SK; Ng LG; Tan BS; Cheng CW; Chee CT; Chan LP; Lo HG
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2001 Nov; 30(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 11817281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.
    Poletti PA; Platon A; Rutschmann OT; Schmidlin FR; Iselin CE; Becker CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):927-33. PubMed ID: 17377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized prospective comparison of non-contrast enhanced helical computed tomography and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of acute ureteric colic.
    Homer JA; Davies-Payne DL; Peddinti BS
    Australas Radiol; 2001 Aug; 45(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 11531750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
    Wang JH; Shen SH; Huang SS; Chang CY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2008 Jan; 71(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 18218557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One year's clinical experience with unenhanced spiral computed tomography for the assessment of acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic.
    Greenwell TJ; Woodhams S; Denton ER; MacKenzie A; Rankin SC; Popert R
    BJU Int; 2000 Apr; 85(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 10759655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic].
    Thibeau JF; Sourtzis S; Bellemans MA; Vandendris M
    Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 10370946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of non-enhanced spiral CT in the assessment of renal colic: prospective series of 81 patients].
    Anfossi E; Eghazarian C; Portier F; Prost J; Ragni E; Daou N; Rossi D
    Prog Urol; 2003 Feb; 13(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 12703351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intravenous urography revisited in the age of ultrasound and computerized tomography: diagnostic yield in cases of renal colic, suspected pelvic and abdominal malignancies, suspected renal mass, and acute pyelonephritis.
    Andresen R; Wegner HE
    Urol Int; 1997; 58(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 9253122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, matched comparison of ultra-low and standard-dose computed tomography for assessment of renal colic.
    Roberts MJ; Williams J; Khadra S; Nalavenkata S; Kam J; McCombie SP; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Khadra M; Varol C; Winter M; Sanaei F; Loh H; Thakkar Y; Dugdale P; Ko R
    BJU Int; 2020 Sep; 126 Suppl 1():27-32. PubMed ID: 32573114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic.
    Tack D; Sourtzis S; Delpierre I; de Maertelaer V; Gevenois PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 12540420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.
    Pfister SA; Deckart A; Laschke S; Dellas S; Otto U; Buitrago C; Roth J; Wiesner W; Bongartz G; Gasser TC
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Nov; 13(11):2513-20. PubMed ID: 12898174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic].
    De Denaro M; Bregant P; Cupardo F; De Guarrini F; Rimondini A; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 11740454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
    Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unenhanced multidetector CT (CT KUB) in the initial imaging of suspected acute renal colic: evaluating a new service.
    Chowdhury FU; Kotwal S; Raghunathan G; Wah TM; Joyce A; Irving HC
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Oct; 62(10):970-7. PubMed ID: 17765462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonobstructing renal stones on unenhanced CT: a real cause for renal colic?
    Furlan A; Federle MP; Yealy DM; Averch TD; Pealer K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):W125-7. PubMed ID: 18212194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of unenhanced computerized tomography urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
    Wang JH; Lin WC; Wei CJ; Chang CY
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2003 Oct; 19(10):503-9. PubMed ID: 14620676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.