173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11604021)
41. 2D QSAR modeling and preliminary database searching for dopamine transporter inhibitors using genetic algorithm variable selection of Molconn Z descriptors.
Hoffman BT; Kopajtic T; Katz JL; Newman AH
J Med Chem; 2000 Nov; 43(22):4151-9. PubMed ID: 11063611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Genetic Algorithm guided Selection: variable selection and subset selection.
Cho SJ; Hermsmeier MA
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 12132894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of a neural net-based QSAR algorithm (PCANN) with Hologram- and multiple linear regression-based QSAR approaches: application to 1,4-dihydropyridine-based calcium channel antagonists.
Viswanadhan VN; Mueller GA; Basak SC; Weinstein JN
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(3):505-11. PubMed ID: 11410024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Neural network studies. 2. Variable selection.
Tetko IV; Villa AE; Livingstone DJ
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1996; 36(4):794-803. PubMed ID: 8768768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. QSAR study of heparanase inhibitors activity using artificial neural networks and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.
Jalali-Heravi M; Asadollahi-Baboli M; Shahbazikhah P
Eur J Med Chem; 2008 Mar; 43(3):548-56. PubMed ID: 17602800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Have artificial neural networks met expectations in drug discovery as implemented in QSAR framework?
Dobchev D; Karelson M
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016 Jul; 11(7):627-39. PubMed ID: 27149299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. GA(M)E-QSAR: a novel, fully automatic genetic-algorithm-(meta)-ensembles approach for binary classification in ligand-based drug design.
Pérez-Castillo Y; Lazar C; Taminau J; Froeyen M; Cabrera-Pérez MÁ; Nowé A
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Sep; 52(9):2366-86. PubMed ID: 22856471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Predictive QSAR modeling of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors.
Kovalishyn V; Tanchuk V; Charochkina L; Semenuta I; Prokopenko V
J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Feb; 32():32-8. PubMed ID: 22023934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Advances in the replacement and enhanced replacement method in QSAR and QSPR theories.
Mercader AG; Duchowicz PR; Fernández FM; Castro EA
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jul; 51(7):1575-81. PubMed ID: 21644502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A group center overlap based approach for "3D QSAR" studies on TIBO derivatives.
Sapre NS; Gupta S; Pancholi N; Sapre N
J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):922-33. PubMed ID: 18785154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evolutionary optimization, backpropagation, and data preparation issues in QSAR modeling of HIV inhibition by HEPT derivatives.
Weekes D; Fogel GB
Biosystems; 2003 Nov; 72(1-2):149-58. PubMed ID: 14642664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Improving quantitative structure-activity relationship models using Artificial Neural Networks trained with dropout.
Mendenhall J; Meiler J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Feb; 30(2):177-89. PubMed ID: 26830599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Using particle swarms for the development of QSAR models based on K-nearest neighbor and kernel regression.
Cedeño W; Agrafiotis DK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(2-4):255-63. PubMed ID: 13677491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Performance of Deep and Shallow Neural Networks, the Universal Approximation Theorem, Activity Cliffs, and QSAR.
Winkler DA; Le TC
Mol Inform; 2017 Jan; 36(1-2):. PubMed ID: 27783464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders.
Marini F; Roncaglioni A; Novic M
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1507-19. PubMed ID: 16309247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Interpreting computational neural network QSAR models: a measure of descriptor importance.
Guha R; Jurs PC
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):800-6. PubMed ID: 15921469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Ensembles of Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks for modeling of acetylcholinesterase inhibition by huprines.
Fernández M; Caballero J
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 Oct; 68(4):201-12. PubMed ID: 17105484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Variable selection in nonlinear modeling based on RBF networks and evolutionary computation.
Patrinos P; Alexandridis A; Ninos K; Sarimveis H
Int J Neural Syst; 2010 Oct; 20(5):365-79. PubMed ID: 20945516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Modified ant colony optimization algorithm for variable selection in QSAR modeling: QSAR studies of cyclooxygenase inhibitors.
Shen Q; Jiang JH; Tao JC; Shen GL; Yu RQ
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1024-9. PubMed ID: 16045297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Application of BCUT metrics and genetic algorithm in binary QSAR analysis.
Gao H
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(2):402-7. PubMed ID: 11277729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
