These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11604793)

  • 1. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ; Kors JA; van Herpen G; van Bemmel JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The coming of age of computerized ECG processing: can it replace the cardiologist in epidemiological studies and clinical trials?
    Kors JA; van Herpen G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11604912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service.
    Woolley D; Henck M; Luck J
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraindividual variability in electrocardiograms.
    Schijvenaars BJ; van Herpen G; Kors JA
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 18358483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE; Rewers AB; Yetman AT; Schaffer MS
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic conclusions from the EASI-derived 12-lead electrocardiogram as compared with the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram in children.
    Welinder A; Feild DQ; Liebman J; Maynard C; Wagner GS; Wettrell G; Pahlm O
    Am Heart J; 2006 May; 151(5):1059-64. PubMed ID: 16644336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of standard 12-lead electrocardiograms from 12-lead electrocardiograms recorded with the Mason-Likar electrode configuration.
    Man SC; Maan AC; Kim E; Draisma HH; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Swenne CA
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18433612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE; Deluca DC; Chien CH; Helfenbein ED; Ariet M
    J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ECGScan: a method for conversion of paper electrocardiographic printouts to digital electrocardiographic files.
    Badilini F; Erdem T; Zareba W; Moss AJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4):310-8. PubMed ID: 16216602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Bogun F; Anh D; Kalahasty G; Wissner E; Bou Serhal C; Bazzi R; Weaver WD; Schuger C
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 15501200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision support for the initial triage of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
    Olsson SE; Ohlsson M; Ohlin H; Dzaferagic S; Nilsson ML; Sandkull P; Edenbrandt L
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 May; 26(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 16640509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The lack of effect of clinical information on electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
    Dunn PM; Levinson W
    Arch Intern Med; 1990 Sep; 150(9):1917-9. PubMed ID: 2393322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Status of computerized electrocardiography.
    Hongo RH; Goldschlager N
    Cardiol Clin; 2006 Aug; 24(3):491-504, x. PubMed ID: 16939838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocardiograms with pacemakers: accuracy of computer reading.
    Guglin ME; Datwani N
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 16919672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra- and interreader variability in QT interval measurement by tangent and threshold methods in a central electrocardiogram laboratory.
    Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Natekar M; Kothari S; Narula D; Lokhandwala Y
    J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 19261293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between QT and RR intervals in digital and digitized paper electrocardiograms: contribution of the printer, scanner, and digitization process.
    Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Deshmukh S; Kothari S; Narula D
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 18482732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Jowett NI; Turner AM; Cole A; Jones PA
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Feb; 81(952):122-5. PubMed ID: 15701746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.