These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11604902)
1. Data quality probes--a synergistic method for quality monitoring of electronic medical record data accuracy and healthcare provision. Brown PJ; Harwood J; Brantigan P Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1116-9. PubMed ID: 11604902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data quality probes-exploiting and improving the quality of electronic patient record data and patient care. Brown PJ; Warmington V Int J Med Inform; 2002 Dec; 68(1-3):91-8. PubMed ID: 12467794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality improvement using electronic medical records: a case study of a high-performing practice. Litvin CB; Ornstein SM; Anthony WE; Tanner D Top Health Inf Manage; 2001 Nov; 22(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11761793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissemination of the use of the electronic patient record in high-quality workmanship: the regional IT consultant for primary care doctors. Demkjaer K; Lehrmann T; Bové T Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():974-7. PubMed ID: 11187701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early experiences in using computerized patient record data for monitoring charting compliance, supporting quality initiatives and assisting with accurate charging at Allina Hospitals & Clinics. Collins B; Wagner M Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):917-25. PubMed ID: 16169768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using computerized medical databases to measure and to improve the quality of intensive care. Rubenfeld GD J Crit Care; 2004 Dec; 19(4):248-56. PubMed ID: 15648042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consequences of impaired data quality on information retrieval in electronic patient records. Mikkelsen G; Aasly J Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jun; 74(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 15893261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing. Rogers JE; Wroe CJ; Roberts A; Swallow A; Stables D; Cantrill JA; Rector AL Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Nov; 53(496):838-44. PubMed ID: 14702902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing documentation for communicating and evaluating care. Törnvall E; Wilhelmsson S J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2116-24. PubMed ID: 18710374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record. Silfen E Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record. Roth CP; Lim YW; Pevnick JM; Asch SM; McGlynn EA Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 19482968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From a paper-based transmission of discharge summaries to electronic communication in health care regions. Schabetsberger T; Ammenwerth E; Andreatta S; Gratl G; Haux R; Lechleitner G; Schindelwig K; Stark C; Vogl R; Wilhelmy I; Wozak F Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(3-4):209-15. PubMed ID: 16112892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new quality improvement study every day? Using QTools to build quality improvement projects around primary care electronic medical record systems. Treweek S Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1106-9. PubMed ID: 15360984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving electronic health record (EHR) accuracy and increasing compliance with health maintenance clinical guidelines through patient access and input. Staroselsky M; Volk LA; Tsurikova R; Pizziferri L; Lippincott M; Wald J; Bates DW Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(10-11):693-700. PubMed ID: 16338169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The General Practice Research Network: the capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data. Sayer GP; McGeechan K; Kemp A; Bhasale A; Horn F; Hendrie L; Swan L; Scahill S Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2003 Sep; 12(6):483-9. PubMed ID: 14513662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic medical records and prevention quality: the prevention index. Vogt TM; Feldstein AC; Aickin M; Hu WR; Uchida AR Am J Prev Med; 2007 Oct; 33(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 17888855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between medical practice characteristics and quality of care for cardiovascular disease. Landon BE; Normand SL; Meara E; Qi Zhou ; Simon SR; Frank R; McNeil BJ Med Care Res Rev; 2008 Apr; 65(2):167-86. PubMed ID: 18096718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards patient-related information needs. Braun LM; Wiesman F; van den Herik HJ; Hasman A; Korsten E Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):246-51. PubMed ID: 16647878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality management issues for medical ICT. Dumay AC; Freriks G Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 103():93-100. PubMed ID: 15747910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study. Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]