These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11604962)

  • 1. An Australian case study of patient attitudes towards the use of computerised medical records and unique identifiers.
    Bomba D; de Silva A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1430-4. PubMed ID: 11604962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information.
    Whiddett R; Hunter I; Engelbrecht J; Handy J
    Int J Med Inform; 2006 Jul; 75(7):530-41. PubMed ID: 16198142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of computerised medical records usage among general practitioners in Australia and Sweden.
    Bomba D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():55-9. PubMed ID: 10384419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information technology and general practice. A survey of general practitioner attitudes towards computerisation.
    Bolton PG; Usher HE; Mira M; Harding LM; Prior G
    Aust Fam Physician; 1999 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S19-21. PubMed ID: 9988923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.
    Alquraini H; Alhashem AM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Feb; 57(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17291201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic patient records. The new black.
    Carlisle D
    Health Serv J; 2007 May; 117(6057):suppl 6-7. PubMed ID: 17582832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New Zealanders' attitudes towards access to their electronic health records: preliminary results from a national study using vignettes.
    Hunter IM; Whiddett RJ; Norris AC; McDonald BW; Waldon JA
    Health Informatics J; 2009 Sep; 15(3):212-28. PubMed ID: 19713396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records.
    Ornstein S; Bearden A
    J Fam Pract; 1994 Jun; 38(6):606-10. PubMed ID: 8195736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computers in the consultation: the patient's view.
    Ridsdale L; Hudd S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Aug; 44(385):367-9. PubMed ID: 8068397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving computer security by health smart card.
    Nisand G; Allaert FA; Brézillon R; Isphording W; Roeslin N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():176-81. PubMed ID: 14663983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?
    Loomis GA; Ries JS; Saywell RM; Thakker NR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 12160503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic Health Records (EHR) in PROMED platform in accordance with the Romanian legislative framework.
    Antohi R; Ogescu C; Bistriceanu D; Stefan L; Dumitru S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 137():34-41. PubMed ID: 18560065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient identifiers: stumbling blocks or cornerstones for CPRs (computer-based patient records)?
    Fitzmaurice JM; Murphy G; Wear P; Korpman R; Weber G; Whiteman J
    Healthc Inform; 1993 May; 10(5):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10126076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care.
    Pyper C; Amery J; Watson M; Crook C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2004 Jan; 54(498):38-43. PubMed ID: 14965405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized patient records: current and future opportunities.
    Hertzberg J
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 15(5):250-5. PubMed ID: 10915517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electronic medical record systems in Israel's public hospitals.
    Lejbkowicz I; Denekamp Y; Reis S; Goldenberg D
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 15473582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating risk exposure in e-health systems.
    Croll PR; Croll J
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(5-6):460-5. PubMed ID: 17126069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The electronic patient record in general practice--a South-African perspective.
    De Wet L; McDonald T; Pistorius G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():9-13. PubMed ID: 10384409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Access to electronic health records in primary care-a survey of patients' views.
    Pyper C; Amery J; Watson M; Crook C
    Med Sci Monit; 2004 Nov; 10(11):SR17-22. PubMed ID: 15507869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.