These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11605868)

  • 1. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method.
    Tomassetti JJ; Taloumis LJ; Denny JM; Fischer JR
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 11605868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions.
    Shellhart WC; Lange DW; Kluemper GT; Hicks EP; Kaplan AL
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 8526291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications.
    Akyalçin S; Doğan S; Dinçer B; Erdinc AM; Oncağ G
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):637-43. PubMed ID: 16808571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Townsend GC
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22866590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tooth width ratios in crowded and noncrowded dentitions.
    Bernabé E; Villanueva KM; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):765-8. PubMed ID: 15673138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New, fast, and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 15821697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
    Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of tooth thickness in predicting intermaxillary tooth-size discrepancies.
    Rudolph DJ; Dominguez PD; Ahn K; Thinh T
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Apr; 68(2):133-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 9564422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cécile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Junior HM; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Int Orthod; 2010 Sep; 8(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 20739241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton's ratios: the reproducibility and speed of two methods of measurement.
    Othman SA; Harradine NW
    J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 34(4):234-42; discussion 233. PubMed ID: 18042824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.