130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11607909)
1. The influence of femoral rollback on patellofemoral contact loads in total knee arthroplasty.
Churchill DL; Incavo SJ; Johnson CC; Beynnon BD
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Oct; 16(7):909-18. PubMed ID: 11607909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numerical analysis of variations in posterior cruciate ligament properties and balancing techniques on total knee arthroplasty loading.
Zelle J; Heesterbeek PJ; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):700-7. PubMed ID: 20451438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patellofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty: effect of extensor moment arm.
Browne C; Hermida JC; Bergula A; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
Knee; 2005 Apr; 12(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 15749440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of increased posterior tibial slope or partial posterior cruciate ligament release on knee kinematics of total knee arthroplasty].
Wang XF; Chen BC; Shi CX; Gao SJ; Shao DC; Li T; Lu B; Chen JQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 45(12):839-42. PubMed ID: 17845788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The function of posterior tilt of the tibial component following posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Takatsu T; Itokazu M; Shimizu K; Brown TD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1998; 57(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9926258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation.
Most E; Li G; Sultan PG; Park SE; Rubash HE
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 16124972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Stiehl JB; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Keblish PA
Am J Knee Surg; 2000; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 11826919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty.
Most E; Zayontz S; Li G; Otterberg E; Sabbag K; Rubash HE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):101-13. PubMed ID: 12771821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of posterior cruciate ligament retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.
Zelle J; Van der Zanden AC; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Dec; 24(10):842-9. PubMed ID: 19733944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of in vivo patellofemoral kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
Carpenter RD; Brilhault J; Majumdar S; Ries MD
Knee; 2009 Oct; 16(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 19188068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [In vitro investigation of posterior cruciate ligament strain following total knee arthroplasty].
Siebel T; Käfer W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16625446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics for subjects having either a posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.
Cates HE; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Schmidt MA; Anderle M
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1057-67. PubMed ID: 18534487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of geometry of the tibial polyethylene insert on the tibiofemoral contact kinematics in Advance Medial Pivot total knee arthroplasty.
Omori G; Onda N; Shimura M; Hayashi T; Sato T; Koga Y
J Orthop Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 19997823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions.
Yoshiya S; Matsui N; Komistek RD; Dennis DA; Mahfouz M; Kurosaka M
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Sep; 20(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 16139716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of component placement on knee kinetics after arthroplasty with an unconstrained prosthesis.
Miller MC; Zhang AX; Petrella AJ; Berger RA; Rubash HE
J Orthop Res; 2001 Jul; 19(4):614-20. PubMed ID: 11518270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads.
Li G; Zayontz S; Most E; Otterberg E; Sabbag K; Rubash HE
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Dec; 16(8 Suppl 1):150-6. PubMed ID: 11742468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living.
Fantozzi S; Catani F; Ensini A; Leardini A; Giannini S
J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2222-9. PubMed ID: 17019683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dynamic in vitro measurement of posterior cruciate ligament load and tibiofemoral stress after TKA in dependence on tibiofemoral slope.
Ostermeier S; Schlomach C; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; Stukenborg-Colsman C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 16494980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads.
Li G; DeFrate LE; Zayontz S; Park SE; Gill TJ
J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):801-6. PubMed ID: 15183437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
