These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11613706)

  • 1. Fertility expectations and behavior among Mexican Americans in Los Angeles, 1973-82.
    Sabagh F
    Soc Sci Q; 1984; 65(2):594-608. PubMed ID: 11613706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The decline of fertility in Los Angeles, California, 1880-1900.
    Mason KO; Weinstein M; Laslett B
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1987 Nov; 41(3):483-99. PubMed ID: 11612347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generational differences in fertility among Mexican Americans: implications for assessing the effects of immigration.
    Bean FD; Cullen RM; Stephen EH; Swicegood CG
    Soc Sci Q; 1984; 65(2):573-82. PubMed ID: 11613705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation, female education and Mexican-American fertility.
    Bean FD; Swicegood G
    Soc Sci Q; 1982; 63(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 11630850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gente de Razón marriage patterns in Spanish and Mexican California: a case study of Santa Barbara and Los Angeles.
    Miranda GE
    South Calif Q; 1981; 63(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11633223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mortality by cause among Spanish surnamed Californians, 1969-71.
    Schoen R; Nelson VE
    Soc Sci Q; 1981; 62(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 11630847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant mortality among New Mexican Hispanics, Anglos, and Indians.
    Rogers RG
    Soc Sci Q; 1984; 65(3):876-84. PubMed ID: 11618515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fertility and the personal exemption: implicit pronatalist policy in the United States.
    Whittington LA; Alm J; Peters HE
    Am Econ Rev; 1990; 80(3):545-56. PubMed ID: 11616494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The polygyny-fertility hypothesis: a re-evaluation.
    Bean LL; Mineau GP
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1986 Mar; 40(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 11611923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mexican fertility and the revolution of 1910-1920.
    Leasure JW
    Popul Rev; 1988; 32(1-2):41-8. PubMed ID: 11613863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mormon demographic history I. Nuptiality and fertility of once-married couples.
    Skolnick M; Bean L; May D; Arbon V; De Nevers K; Cartwright P
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1978 Mar; 32(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 11630570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agricultural variation and human fertility in antebellum Pennsylvania.
    Laidig GL
    J Fam Hist; 1981; 6():195-204. PubMed ID: 11611375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polygyny and fertility in nineteenth-century America.
    Smith JE; Kunz PR
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1976; 30():465-80. PubMed ID: 11630561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective fertility and underlying preferences: a longitudinal study in Taiwan.
    Coombs LC
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1979 Nov; 33(3):429-46. PubMed ID: 11630623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fertility patterns and trends among the Old Order Amish.
    Ericksen JA; Ericksen EP; Hostetler JA; Huntington GE
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1979 Jul; 33(2):255-76. PubMed ID: 11630609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mexican-American ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and infant mortality: a county-level analysis.
    Eberstein IW; Pol LG
    Soc Sci J; 1982; 19(2):61-71. PubMed ID: 11615155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Philadelphia gentry: fertility and family limitation among an American aristocracy.
    Kantrow L
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1980 Mar; 34(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 11630653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Jewish fertility trends and differentials: an examination of the evidence from the census of 1970.
    Watts RK
    Jew Soc Stud; 1980; 42(3-4):293-312. PubMed ID: 11614849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Childbearing patterns in 1850 rural America. Fertility differentials in an agricultural society: Saginaw County, Michigan, in 1850.
    Ross GA
    Mich Acad; 1988; 20(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 11620262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Family size and fertility control in eighteenth-century America: a study of Quaker families.
    Wells RV
    Popul Stud (Camb); 1971; 25():73-82. PubMed ID: 11630442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.