These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1161441)
1. Recalibration by pairing: a process of perceptual learning. Epstein W Perception; 1975; 4(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 1161441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy. Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size. Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of light intensity on binocular distance perception]. Heller J; Reyersbach R Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 7497071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis. Makino Y; Yano M Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further consideration of size illusions in random dot stereograms. Greene E; Gentner S Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11693687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception. Burge J; Peterson MA; Palmer SE J Vis; 2005 Jun; 5(6):534-42. PubMed ID: 16097866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. THE SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. AM 64-13. GOGEL WC Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US; 1964 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 14293289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of perceptual cues in the trapezoid oscillatory illusion. Martinetti RF J Gen Psychol; 1975 Jan; 92(1st Half):129-35. PubMed ID: 1113085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. Gogel WC Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):477-97. PubMed ID: 4660703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances. Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information. Kuroki D; Nakamizo S Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments. Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motion parallax, relative size, and Benussi effect. Brigner WL; Deni JR Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Jun; 76(3 Pt 2):1320-2. PubMed ID: 8337085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. BAIRD JC J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]