These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Fixed-interval responding under second-order schedules of food presentation or cocaine injection. Kelleher RT; Goldberg SR J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Nov; 28(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 411869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Some effects of d-amphetamine, caffeine, nicotine and cocaine on schedule-controlled responding of the mouse. Glowa JR Neuropharmacology; 1986 Oct; 25(10):1127-35. PubMed ID: 3785580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of different food-reinforcement histories on cocaine self-administration by rhesus monkeys. Nader MA; Bowen CA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Apr; 118(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 7617821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in the rhesus monkey. Garza RD; Johanson CE Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Jul; 19(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 6622506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Drug effects on an effortful operant: pentobarbital and amphetamine. Newland MC; Weiss B Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1990 Jun; 36(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 2356211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of d-amphetamine, pentobarbital, chlorpromazine and promazine on electric shock postponement responding by the pigeon. Leander JD J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1976 Jul; 198(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 933011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of phencyclidine, d-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in rats. Segal SA; Moerschbaecher JM; Thompson DM Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Nov; 15(5):807-12. PubMed ID: 7312916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of d-amphetamine on responding of squirrel monkeys maintained under second-order schedules of food presentation, electric shock presentation or stimulus-shock termination. Barrett JE; Katz JL; Glowa JR J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 7264953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The reinforcing properties of diazepam under several conditions in the rhesus monkey. Bergman J; Johanson CE Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 86(1-2):108-13. PubMed ID: 3927346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of chronic d-amphetamine administration on the reinforcing strength of cocaine in rhesus monkeys. Czoty PW; Martelle JL; Nader MA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 May; 209(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 20217052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of drug effects on fixed-ratio performance and chain performance maintained under a second-order fixed-ratio schedule. Winsauer PJ; Thompson DM; Moerschbaecher JM J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Nov; 44(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 4086974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The reinforcing properties of procaine and d-amphetamine compared in rhesus monkeys. Hammerbeck DM; Mitchell CL J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1978 Mar; 204(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 416198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Further evaluation of the reinforcing effects of the novel cocaine analog 2beta-propanoyl-3beta-(4-tolyl)-tropane (PTT) in rhesus monkeys. Birmingham AM; Nader SH; Grant KA; Davies HM; Nader MA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1998 Mar; 136(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 9551770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules. Louie AK J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Jul; 34(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 7420008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differential effects of pentobarbital and cocaine on punished and nonpunished responding. Dworkin SI; Bimle C; Miyauchi T J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Mar; 51(2):173-84. PubMed ID: 2708936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Behavioral effects of self-administered cocaine: responding maintained alternately by cocaine and electric shock in squirrel monkeys. Spealman RD; Kelleher RT J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1979 Aug; 210(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 110922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies. Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]