119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11632249)
1. Family limitation and the English demographic revolution: a simulation approach.
Crafts NF; Ireland NJ
J Econ Hist; 1976; 36(3):598-623. PubMed ID: 11632249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Family planning: cultural and religious perspectives.
Schenker JG; Rabenou V
Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):969-76. PubMed ID: 8345093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family limitation in pre-industrial England.
Wrigley EA
Econ Hist Rev; 1966; 19():82-109. PubMed ID: 11620370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Philadelphia gentry: fertility and family limitation among an American aristocracy.
Kantrow L
Popul Stud (Camb); 1980 Mar; 34(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 11630653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Marital fertility in seventeenth century Colyton.
Wrigley EA
Econ Hist Rev; 1978; 31(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 11614423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Not Available].
Knodel J
Ann Econ Soc Civilis; 1981; 36(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 11631506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Not Available].
Dupâquier J; Lachiver M
Ann Econ Soc Civilis; 1981; 36(3):489-92. PubMed ID: 11631507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The fall of marital fertility in nineteenth-century France: exemplar or exception? (Part I).
Wrigley EA
Eur J Popul; 1985 Jan; 1(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 12159012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Not Available].
Perrenoud A
Ann Demogr Hist (Paris); 1988; ():59-78. PubMed ID: 11637904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries.
Westoff CF; Hammerslough CR; Paul L
Eur J Popul; 1987 Nov; 3(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 12280731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The contraceptive pill and women's employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963-1980: a challenge to the conventional view.
Murphy M
Popul Stud (Camb); 1993 Jul; 47(2):221-43. PubMed ID: 11613056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mortality in pre-industrial England: the example of Colyton, Devon, over three centuries.
Wrigley EA
Daedalus; 1968; 97():547-80. PubMed ID: 11609519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Birth control and the fertility of the U. S. Black population, 1880 to 1980.
McFalls JA; Masnick GS
J Fam Hist; 1981; 6(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 11610908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fertility, nuptiality, and family limitation among the Wends of Serbin, Texas, 1854 to 1920.
Fliess KH
J Fam Hist; 1988; 13(2):251-63. PubMed ID: 11621506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Not Available].
Dupâquier J
Ann Econ Soc Civilis; 1978; 33(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 11631482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peasant families and population control in eighteenth-century Japan.
Eng RY; Smith TC
J Interdiscip Hist; 1976; 6(3):417-45. PubMed ID: 11632275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fertility transition in a New England commercial center: Nantucket, Massachusetts, 1680-1840.
Byers E
J Interdiscip Hist; 1982; 13(1):17-40. PubMed ID: 11632300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Family planning programs and birth control in the third world].
Wohlschlagl H
Demogr Inf; 1991; ():17-34, 153. PubMed ID: 12343122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The origins of the birth control movement in England in the early nineteenth century.
Langer WL
J Interdiscip Hist; 1975; 5(4):669-86. PubMed ID: 11619426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adapting methods to needs: studying fertility and nuptiality in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Belgium.
Gutmann MR; Wyrick R
Hist Methods; 1981; 14(4):163-71. PubMed ID: 11614592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
